Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449511›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function.

Gemma L Holliday, Shoshana D Brown, David Mischel, Benjamin J Polacco, Patricia C Babbitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gemma L HollidayDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, CA 94143, USA.
Shoshana D BrownDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, CA 94143, USA.
David MischelDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, CA 94143, USA.
Benjamin J PolaccoDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, CA 94143, USA.
Patricia C BabbittDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, CA 94143, USA.

Funding

Core H: MicrobiologyU54GM093342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CRONAN, JOHN E. · 2010 to 2015
$34.6M
Theoretical and Computational ApproachesP01GM071790 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GERLT, JOHN A · 2004 to 2013
$15.5M
GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
Laying the Foundation of Genomic EnzymologyR01GM060595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BABBITT, PATRICIA CLEMENT · 2000 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071790NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060595NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM093342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the molecular function of enzymes discovered by genome sequencing represents a primary foundation for understanding many aspects of biology. Historically, classification of enzyme reactions has used the enzyme nomenclature system developed to describe the overall reactions performed by biochemically characterized enzymes, irrespective of their associated sequences. In contrast, functional classification and assignment for the millions of protein sequences of unknown function now available is largely done in two computational steps, first by similarity-based assignment of newly obtained sequences to homologous groups, followed by transferring to them the known functions of similar biochemically characterized homologs. Due to the fundamental differences in their etiologies and practice, `how' these chemistry- and evolution-centric functional classification systems relate to each other has been difficult to explore on a large scale. To investigate this issue in a new way, we integrated two published ontologies that had previously described each of these classification systems independently. The resulting infrastructure was then used to compare the functional assignments obtained from each classification system for the well-studied and functionally diverse enolase superfamily. Mapping these function assignments to protein structure and reaction similarity networks shows a profound and complex disconnect between the homology- and chemistry-based classification systems. This conclusion mirrors previous observations suggesting that except for closely related sequences, facile annotation transfer from small numbers of characterized enzymes to the huge number uncharacterized homologs to which they are related is problematic. Our extension of these comparisons to large enzyme superfamilies in a computationally intelligent manner provides a foundation for new directions in protein function prediction for the huge proportion of sequences of unknown function represented in major databases. Interactive sequence, reaction, substrate and product similarity networks computed for this work for the enolase and two other superfamilies are freely available for download from the Structure Function Linkage Database Archive (http://sfld.rbvi.ucsf.edu).

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinEnzymesComputational BiologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationStructure-Activity RelationshipEnzymesComparison of enzyme classification systemsEnzyme classification systemsEnzyme functionEvolution- versus reaction-based enzyme classificationFunctional annotationStructure–function relationshipsStructure–reaction relationships

Identifiers

PMID32449511
PMCPMC7246345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.