Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449239›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2020

Peptide vaccine as an adjuvant therapy for glypican-3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma induces peptide-specific CTLs and improves long prognosis.

Masatake Taniguchi, Shoichi Mizuno, Toshiaki Yoshikawa, Norihiro Fujinami, Motokazu Sugimoto, Shin Kobayashi, Shinichiro Takahashi, Masaru Konishi, Naoto Gotohda, Tetsuya Nakatsura

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing CD8Clinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masatake TaniguchiDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-9648
Shoichi MizunoDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Toshiaki YoshikawaDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Norihiro FujinamiDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Motokazu SugimotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shin KobayashiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shinichiro TakahashiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Masaru KonishiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Naoto GotohdaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tetsuya NakatsuraDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-2385
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

Killer T Save You Co,LtdNational Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 25-A-7National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 28-A-8OncoTherapy Science,IncSysmex Co,LtdThyas Co,Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no established postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and improvement of patient prognosis has been limited. We conducted long-term monitoring of patients within a phase II trial that targeted a cancer antigen, glypican-3 (GPC3), specifically expressed in HCC. We sought to determine if the GPC3 peptide vaccine was an effective adjuvant therapy by monitoring disease-free survival and overall survival. We also tracked GPC3 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, CTL induction, and postoperative plasma GPC3 for a patient group that was administered the vaccine (n = 35) and an unvaccinated patient group that underwent surgery only (n = 33). The 1-y recurrence rate after surgery was reduced by approximately 15%, and the 5-y and 8-y survival rates were improved by approximately 10% and 30%, respectively, in the vaccinated group compared with the unvaccinated group. Patients who were positive for GPC3 IHC staining were more likely to have induced CTLs, and 60% survived beyond 5 y. Vaccine efficacy had a positive relationship with plasma concentration of GPC3; high concentrations increased the 5-y survival rate to 75%. We thus expect GPC3 vaccination in patients with HCC, who are positive for GPC3 IHC staining and/or plasma GPC3 to induce CTL and have significantly improved long-term prognosis.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAgedCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, HepatocellularCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlypicansHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSurvival RateCancer VaccinesGlypicansGPC3 protein, humanVaccines, Subunitcytotoxic T lymphocyteglypican-3hepatocellular carcinomaimmunohistochemical stainingpeptide vaccine

Identifiers

PMID32449239
PMCPMC7419030
OpenAlexW3028490328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.