Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449213›Full record

Trial reportHuman psychopharmacology2020

Effects of lasmiditan on simulated driving performance: Results of two randomized, blinded, crossover studies with placebo and active controls.

Eric M Pearlman, Darren Wilbraham, Ellen B Dennehy, Paul H Berg, Max Tsai, Erin G Doty, Gary G Kay

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Migraine and cognitive dysfunction: a narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Neuropsychiatric Safety Profile of Lasmiditan: A Comparative Disproportionality Analysis with Triptans.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  16. The 5-HTNature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  19. Novel Migraine Treatments: A ReviewJournal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric M PearlmanEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Darren WilbrahamEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ellen B DennehyEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Paul H BergEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Max TsaiEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Erin G DotyEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Gary G KayCognitive Research Corporation, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCognitive Research (United States) · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of lasmiditan, an oral, centrally-penetrant, selective serotonin 1F (5-HT

methodsHealthy adult volunteers enrolled in two randomized, placebo and active comparator-controlled, crossover studies. Study 1 (N = 90) tested lasmiditan (50-, 100-, 200-mg), alprazolam (1-mg), and placebo at 1.5 hr post-dose. Study 2 (N = 68) tested lasmiditan (100-, 200-mg), diphenhydramine (50-mg, administered 2 hr pre-assessments), and placebo at 8, 12 and 24 hr post-dose. Driving performance was assessed using a validated driving simulator employing a 100 km driving scenario. Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a measure of lane position control, was the primary endpoint.

resultsAssay sensitivity was confirmed by increased SDLP for active comparators at 1.5- and 8-hr time points. Lasmiditan doses showed significant driving impairment versus placebo at 1.5 hr post-dose. Lasmiditan doses were non-inferior to placebo at 8 hr. Driving impairment was concentration-dependent at 1.5 hr but not at 8 hr. Common adverse events were central nervous system-related and mild-to-moderate in severity.

conclusionsLasmiditan was associated with impaired simulated driving performance at 1.5 hr post-dose, but showed no clinically meaningful impairment at 8 hr post-dose.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingAdultBenzamidesCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyridinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1FReceptors, SerotoninSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTime FactorsBenzamideslasmiditanPiperidinesPyridinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1FReceptors, SerotoninSerotonin Receptor Agonistslasmiditanmigraineselective serotonin receptor agonist

Identifiers

PMID32449213
PMCPMC7539914
OpenAlexW3026566790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.