Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449137›Full record

ReviewActa neurologica Belgica2020

Single and simultaneous multiple intracerebral hemorrhages: a radiological review.

Dimitri Renard, Giovanni Castelnovo, Ioana Ion, Jean Sebastien Guillamo, Eric Thouvenot

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04456309 (Brain MRI Characteristics in Stroke Patients With Intracardiac Thrombus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04456309 completednot on this map

Brain MRI Characteristics in Stroke Patients With Intracardiac Thrombus

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2020 to 2020Enrolled122ConditionsStroke, Intracardiac ThrombusArmsNo intervention,
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitri RenardDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, University of Montpellier, 4, Rue Du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 4, France. dimitrirenard@hotmail.com.
Giovanni CastelnovoDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, University of Montpellier, 4, Rue Du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 4, France.
Ioana IonDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, University of Montpellier, 4, Rue Du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 4, France.
Jean Sebastien GuillamoDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, University of Montpellier, 4, Rue Du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 4, France.
Eric ThouvenotDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, University of Montpellier, 4, Rue Du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 4, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous multiple intracerebral hemorrhage (SMICH) is defined as ICH in two or more discrete noncontiguous acute intraparenchymal locations on initial CT. About 5% of ICH patients present with SMICH. ICH/SMICH etiology is classically divided into disorders of primary or secondary origin. About half of primary SMICH cases are caused by cerebral amyloid angiopathy or hypertensive arteriopathy. In this review, we will discuss the radiological features associated with the different causes of primary and secondary ICH and SMICH. Due to its rarity and the associated high morbidity and mortality, we will focus in particular on SMICH.

Indexed as

RadiographyCerebral Amyloid AngiopathyCerebral HemorrhageCognitionHumansHypertensionTreatment OutcomeIntracerebral hemorrhageMultipleSimultaneous

Identifiers

PMID32449137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.