Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449125›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Dynamic evaluation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

V Palomar-Abril, T Soria-Comes, S T Campos, M M Ureste, V G Bosch, I C M Maiques

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V Palomar-AbrilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Comunitat Valenciana, 46017, Valencia, Spain. vicente.palomar.abril@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-7377
T Soria-ComesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Comunitat Valenciana, 46017, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1125-7824
S T CamposDepartment of Applied Statistics, Operations Research and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València, Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-1407
M M UresteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Comunitat Valenciana, 46017, Valencia, Spain.
V G BoschCentre for Quality and Change Management, Universitat Politècnica de València, Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1375-4461
I C M MaiquesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Comunitat Valenciana, 46017, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-0900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLocally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is frequently treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Despite the efforts, long-term outcomes are poor, and novel therapies have been introduced to improve results. Biomarkers are needed to detect early treatment failure and plan future follow-up and therapies. Our aim is to evaluate the role of dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with CRT.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with LA-NSCLC receiving definitive CRT at our center from 2010 to 2015. Baseline and post-treatment NLR were collected from our center database. NLR was dichotomized (threshold = 4) and patients were divided into two groups based on the variation from baseline to post-treatment NLR. The prognostic role and association with response were examined with logistic regression and multivariate Cox regression model, respectively.

resultsNinety-two patients were included. Our analysis shows that NLR after treatment is associated with response to treatment [OR in the multivariate analysis 4.94 (1.01-24.48); p value = 0.048]. Furthermore, NLR and ECOG are independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Specifically, PFS was 25.79 months for the good prognosis group and 12.09 for the poor prognosis group [HR 2.98 (CI 95% = 1.74-5.10), p < 0.001]; and OS was 42.94 months and 18.86 months, respectively [HR 2.81 (CI 95% = 1.62-4.90), p < 0.001].

conclusionDynamics of NLR have a prognostic value in stage III NSCLC treated with definitive CRT. Pre- and post-CRT NLR should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials involving consolidation treatment with immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsChemoradiotherapyNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioNon-small cell lung cancerStage IIISurvival outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.