Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449118›Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Annalisa Racca, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Ana Raquel Neves, Nikolaos P Polyzos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolving PCOS Management: From Symptom Control to Phenotype-Targeted Therapy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Significance ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annalisa RaccaCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Panagiotis DrakopoulosCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ana Raquel NevesDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Nikolaos P PolyzosDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. nikpol@dexeus.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6161-0011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproduction technologies have substantially advanced since the birth of the first in vitro fertilization baby, and innovations within in vitro fertilization laboratories have been of paramount importance for the overall assisted reproduction technology success rates. However, one of the milestones in the history of in vitro fertilization is irrefutably the introduction of conventional ovarian stimulation. The objective of the present review is to provide an update on conventional ovarian stimulation, by giving an overview of treatment milestones, together with the latest innovations currently being investigated. The realization of an assisted reproduction technology treatment depends on many steps that can be medically manipulated and must be harmoniously combined, starting from the follicular phase and ending with luteal phase support. New technologies in the pharmaceutical sector are fundamental to optimize efficiency and tailor treatment approaches to individual needs. The present review aims to offer physicians a useful summary of the more recent publications and to facilitate the translation of research findings into daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Ovulation InductionReproductive Techniques, AssistedFemaleHumansOvulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.