Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449081›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2020

A comparative study of heterogeneous antibiotic resistance of microbial populations in conventional periprosthetic tissue cultures and sonication fluid cultures of orthopaedics explanted prostheses.

Angeliki Banousi, Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos, Antonios Stylianakis, Emmanouil Fandridis, Sofia Chatziioannou, Nikolaos V Sipsas, Spyridon G Pneumaticos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angeliki Banousi3rd Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. anbanousi@gmail.com.
Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos3rd Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Antonios StylianakisLaboratory of Implant Associated Infections, Department of Microbiology, General Hospital KAT, Athens, Greece.
Emmanouil FandridisHand-Upper Limb and Microsurgery Department, General Hospital KAT, Athens, Greece.
Sofia ChatziioannouNuclear Medicine Division, PET/CT section, Foundation for Biomedical Research of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos V SipsasDepartment of Pathophysiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Spyridon G Pneumaticos3rd Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Heterogeneity" describes a phenomenon where subpopulations of seemingly isogenic bacteria exhibit a range of susceptibilities to a particular antibiotic. We aim to investigate the frequency of heterogeneity among microbes isolated from infected prostheses, and its possible correlation with microbial resistance.

methodsBetween May 2014 and June 2019, we investigated 234 patients, at our institution, undergoing revision arthroplasty because of loosening of the prostheses or because of periprosthetic joint infection. All patients had periprosthetic tissue culture, sonication of prosthesis and direct inoculation of Sonication fluid into blood culture bottles. We assessed the presence of heterogeneity among all pathogens isolated from infected prostheses.

resultsUsing standard non-microbiological criteria to determine periprosthetic joint infection, it was found that 143 patient (61.1%) had aseptic loosening while 91 patients (38.9%) had periprosthetic joint infection. Comparing the two methods, the results of our study showed that the method of sonication was significantly more sensitive than tissue culture [91% (83-96) vs. 43% (33-54); p < 0.005]. In this study, heterogeneity was reported in 15 cases, 16.5% of all infections and 6.4% in the total population. In our study, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly isolated strain followed by Staphylococcus aureus, at a rate of 35.2% and 19.8%, respectively. Antibiotics in which the microorganisms exhibited heterogeneous bacterial behavior most frequently were Gendamicin (5.3%), Vancomycin (4.9%).

conclusionThere is increasing evidence that heterogeneity can lead to therapeutic failure and that the detection of this phenotype is a prerequisite for a proper antibiotic choice to have a successful therapeutic effect.

Indexed as

OrthopedicsProsthesis-Related InfectionsDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansProstheses and ImplantsSonicationDiagnosisHeterogeneityProsthetic joint infectionSonication fluid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.