Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449033›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Post surgical rectovaginal fistula: who really benefits from stoma diversion?

Giuliano Barugola, Elisa Bertocchi, Alessandra Leonardi, Alex M Almoudaris, Giacomo Ruffo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic vs Open Diverting Colostomy for Radiation-Related Rectovaginal Fistula.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  9. Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuliano BarugolaDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, Negrar Di Valpolicella, 37024, Verona, Italy.
Elisa BertocchiDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, Negrar Di Valpolicella, 37024, Verona, Italy. elisa.bertocchi@sacrocuore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-6493
Alessandra LeonardiDepartement of Surgery, "San Pellegrino" Hospital, Castiglione delle Stiviere, Mantova, Italy.
Alex M AlmoudarisDepartment of Coloproctology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, England.
Giacomo RuffoDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, Negrar Di Valpolicella, 37024, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITOspedale dei Pellegrini · ITUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the role of stoma diversion and timing of stoma maintenance in the healing of post-surgical Recto Vaginal Fistulae (psRVF). A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry. All patients with a psRVF diagnosed at IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar di Valpolicella from January 2002 to December 2016 were analyzed. The baseline treatment was a fecal diversion. Patients were divided into two groups according to healing time: < 6 months (Group 1) or > 6 months (Group 2). 2043 women underwent rectal resections in the study period. We recorded 37 patients with psRVF (1.8%). Nineteen women (51.3%) healed (Group 1) within 6 months. The median time of psRVF recovery in group 1 was 99.7 days. Concomitant local treatment of the fistula did not influence the healing rate (p 0.8). Colostomies were significantly higher in group 1 (p 0.003). The size of the psRVF influenced the success rate of fistula healing with loop stoma (p 0.07). A multivariate analysis the presence of fever and pelvic abscess (pelvis sepsis) were significantly associated with diversion failure (p 0.035). A step-up approach with the maintenance of loop stoma at least for six months for all patients with psRVF could be changed. Patients with larger fistula and pelvic sepsis at index procedure should be addressed earlier to a specific second-level treatment.

Indexed as

Surgical StomasAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryColostomyEndometriosisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectovaginal FistulaRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic leakEndometriosisRecto-vaginal fistulaStoma diversion

Identifiers

PMID32449033
OpenAlexW3027178789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.