Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449032›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Evolution and time trends of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-center experience.

Erika Barbieri, Federico Frusone, Alberto Bottini, Andrea Sagona, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Giuseppe Canavese, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Alessandro De Luca, Emilia Marrazzo, Maria Ida Amabile and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erika BarbieriBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Federico FrusoneDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. federico.frusone@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-3928
Alberto BottiniBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SagonaBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Wolfgang GatzemeierBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CanaveseBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina AngheloneBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro De LucaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Emilia MarrazzoBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Ida AmabileDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Corrado TinterriBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) requires the entire breast tissue to be removed, maintaining the nipple-areola complex, and represents nowadays the gold standard of the demolitive breast surgery. Although it represents the evolution of conservative breast surgery, NSM presents some limitations in the selection of women candidates for treatment, and still there are no real guidelines regarding its indications, but simply objective data to address the choice. How the breast surgery approach to demolitive and conservative surgery has changed over time? We evaluated throughout the years (from 2009 up to 2018) the time trend of NSM at our institution and analysed the main differences between patients undergone NSM and other mastectomies and/or breast conserving surgery in terms of cancer size, multicentricity and biological profile. We found 781 NSMs, 1261 other mastectomies and 5621 breast conservative surgeries. Among NSMs, 39.6% were reconstructed with tissue expander and 58.1% with definitive prosthesis. From 2009 to 2018 we found a general increase of NSM rate (from 21.3% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 67.3% in 2018) and a decrease of total mastectomies (from 78.7% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 32.7% in 2018). In line with the literature data, our data confirm that in the recent years NSM represents the gold standard for radical breast surgery. Undisputed in prophylaxis, NSM is continuously acquiring more support in being used as first line treatment for locally advanced disease.

Indexed as

BreastBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyNeoplasm StagingNipplesOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPlastic Surgery ProceduresTissue Expansion DevicesBreast cancerBreast surgeryMastectomyNipple Sparing Mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID32449032
OpenAlexW3026286180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.