Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448992›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Effectiveness of wheat soya blend supplementation during pregnancy and lactation on pregnancy outcomes and nutritional status of their infants at 6 months of age in Thatta and Sujawal districts of Sindh, Pakistan: a cluster randomized-controlled trial.

Gul Nawaz Khan, Shabina Ariff, Sumra Kureishy, Muhammad Sajid, Arjumand Rizvi, Cecilia Garzon, Mica Jenkins, Saskia de Pee, Sajid Bashir Soofi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Gul Nawaz KhanDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shabina AriffDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sumra KureishyWorld Food Programme, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad SajidDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Arjumand RizviDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Cecilia GarzonWorld Food Programme, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mica JenkinsWorld Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
Saskia de PeeWorld Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
Sajid Bashir SoofiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. sajid.soofi@aku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-8406
Zulfiqar A BhuttaInstitute for Global Health and Development, A, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PKTufts University · USWorld Food Programme · IT

Funding

World Food Programme (WFP) PAK/2014/005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the effectiveness of wheat soya blend plus (WSBP) provided during pregnancy and lactation on weight gain during pregnancy, reduction of low birthweight (LBW), and improvement in nutritional status in infants at 6 months of age in Thatta and Sujawal districts of Sindh, Pakistan.

methodsA cluster randomized-controlled trial was conducted in Thatta and Sujawal districts in Pakistan from August 2014 to December 2016. A total of 2030 pregnant women were enrolled in the study. These women and their infants were followed during pregnancy and first 6 months of life. Pregnant women received a monthly ration of 5 kg (i.e., 165 g/day) of WSB + during pregnancy and the first 6 months of their lactation period.

resultsThere was no difference in weight gain during pregnancy between the intervention and control groups (n = 496, 326.7 g/week 95% CI 315.2-338.1 vs. (n = 507, 306.9 g/week, 95% CI 279.9-333.9 P = 0.192), after adjustment with different factors. The reduction in the prevalence of LBW was not different between intervention and control groups (n = 325, 34.0%, 95% CI 31.7-36.4, vs. (n = 127, 34.3%, 95% CI 27.2-41.5, P = 0.932). Significant reductions in risk of stunting (n = 1319 RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, P = 0.041), wasting (n = 1330 RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.91, P = 0.003), and underweight (n = 1295 RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.87, P < 0.001) were observed in infants at 6 months of age in the intervention as compared to the control group. However, no difference was noted on reduction in the risk of stunting among infants at 6 months of age in the intervention and control group (n = 1318 RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.07, P = 0.253) after adjustment. A significant reduction in anemia was noted (n = 1328 RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98, P = 0.002) in infants at 6 months of age in the intervention as compared to the control group in adjusted analysis.

conclusionsProvision of WSB + during pregnancy and the first 6 months of lactation is effective in reducing the risk of under nutrition and anemia in infants at 6 months of age. This study can potentially guide the government and donor agencies in investing in nutritional programmes, especially for pregnant and lactating women living in vulnerable settings.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsNutritional StatusSoy FoodsTriticumFemaleHumansInfantLactationPakistanPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeLow birthweightStuntingWastingWeight gainWheat soya blend

Identifiers

PMID32448992
OpenAlexW3027945851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.