ArticleJournal of neurology2020
The integration of multisensory motion stimuli is impaired in vestibular migraine patients.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond VOR gain: the functional head impulse test as a probe of multisensory integration and gaze stabilization.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- vHIT and fHIT in Patients With Migraine, Vestibular Migraine, and Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Vestibular Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: a Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Motion sickness whilst reading as a passenger in the car is highly predictive of vestibular migraine.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Altered functional activity in the right superior temporal gyrus in patients with definite vestibular migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- "The Pupillary (Hippus) Nystagmus": A Possible Clinical Hallmark to Support the Diagnosis of Vestibular Migraine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of video head impulse test during vertiginous attack in vestibular migraine.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022Article
- The clinical significance of fHIT in migraine patient without vertigo symptom.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- Sensory organization of balance control in children with vestibular migraine and recurrent vertigo of childhood.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- The Role of the Functional Head Impulse Test with and without Optokinetic Stimuli in Vestibular Migraine and Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy: Discovering a Dynamic Visual Dependence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Care Gaps and Recommendations in Vestibular Migraine: An Expert Panel Summit.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Concurrent VVOR and VORS profiling reveals a threshold-dependent VOR suppression deficit in vestibular migraine.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVestibular migraine (VM) is a relatively recently acknowledged vestibular syndrome with a very relevant prevalence of about 10% among patients complaining of vertigo. The diagnostic criteria for VM have been recently published by the Bárány Society, and they are now included in the latest version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, yet there is no instrumental test that supports the diagnosis of VM.
objectiveIn the hypothesis that the integration of different vestibular stimuli is functionally impaired in VM, we tested whether the combination of abrupt vestibular stimuli and full-field, moving visual stimuli would challenge vestibular migraine patients more than controls and other non-vestibular migraineurs.
methodsIn three clinical centers, we compared the performance in the functional head impulse test (fHIT) without and with an optokinetic stimulus rotating in the frontal plane in a group of 44 controls (Ctrl), a group of 42 patients with migraine (not vestibular migraine, MnoV), a group of 39 patients with vestibular migraine (VM) and a group of 15 patients with vestibular neuritis (VN).
resultsThe optokinetic stimulation reduced the percentage of correct answers (%CA) in all groups, and in about 33% of the patients with migraine, in as many as 87% of VM patients and 60% of VN patients, this reduction was larger than expected from controls' data.
conclusionsThe comparison of the fHIT results without and with optokinetic stimulation unveils a functional vestibular impairment in VM that is not as large as the one detectable in VN, and that, in contrast with all the other patient groups, mainly impairs the capability to integrate different vestibular stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.