Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448948›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

FRAX score and recent fall history predict the incidence for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study.

H Matsumoto, C Tanimura, D Kushida, H Osaka, Y Kawabata, H Hagino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Urinary pentosidine level is associated with the risk of fracture in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H MatsumotoDepartment of Physical Therapist, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Matsushima 288, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan. h.matsumoto0612@mw.kawasaki-m.ac.jp.
C TanimuraSchool of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishicho 86, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan.
D KushidaDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, (Cross-Informatics Research Center), Tottori University, Koyama-cho Minami 4-101, Tottori, 680-8552, Japan.
H OsakaDepartment of Physical Therapist, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Matsushima 288, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan.
Y KawabataDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shuto General Hospital, JA Yamaguchi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperative, Kogaisaku 1000-1, Yanai, Yamaguchi, 742-0032, Japan.
H HaginoSchool of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishicho 86, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan.
Tottori University · JPKawasaki University of Medical Welfare · JPShuto General Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19K11809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesized that the baseline FRAX score and previous falls would predict the incidence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults who received medical check-ups. The FRAX score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.087, 95% CI 1.014-1.167) and previous falls (HR = 5.181, 95% CI 1.002-26.777) were determined to be independent risk factors for the incidence of sarcopenia. PURPOSE: This prospective study was performed to elucidate the prevalence and incidence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults who received medical check-ups, and to determine whether FRAX score and fall history predict the incidence of sarcopenia.

methodsParticipants were recruited from a group of individuals who had registered for an annual town-sponsored medical check-up. Study inclusion criteria were aged older than 60 years, living independently, and ability to walk without assistance. Individuals who received nursing care were excluded from the study. A total of 426 residential participants were analyzed. Demographic information, fall history of the previous year, and FRAX score without bone mineral density were assessed. The assessment for sarcopenia was based on the recommendations of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia.

resultsThe final sample for the assessment of sarcopenia incidence comprised 258 participants. The mean follow-up time was 2.92 years. The rate of sarcopenia was 1.06 cases per 100 person-years at risk. The Cox multivariate logistic regression model in our analysis was adjusted for age, gender, muscle mass, and covariates and showed that the FRAX score (HR = 1.087, 95% CI 1.014-1.167) and recent history of falls (HR = 5.181, 95% CI 1.002-26.777) were independent risk factors for the incidence of sarcopenia.

conclusionFRAX and history of falling can be a simple screening tool to raise awareness of the prevention of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsSarcopeniaAgedHumansIncidenceIndependent LivingMiddle AgedProspective StudiesFallsFRAXIncidenceSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID32448948
OpenAlexW3028188031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.