Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448923›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Melanoma Diagnostic Practices of French-Speaking Belgian General Practitioners and the Prospective Study of Their Pigmented Skin Lesion Diagnostic Accuracy and Management.

E Harkemanne, C Duyver, S Leconte, C Bugli, L Thomas, M Baeck, I Tromme

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of skin biopsy practices: A comprehensive nationwide study on skin cancer and melanoma biopsies.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E HarkemanneDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. evelyne.harkemanne@uclouvain.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-9868
C DuyverCentre Académique de Médecine Générale (CAMG), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
S LeconteCentre Académique de Médecine Générale (CAMG), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
C BugliStatistical Methodology and Computing Service (SMCS), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
L ThomasDermatology Department, Lyon Cancer Research Center INSERM, Université Lyon 1, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France.
M BaeckDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
I TrommeDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEMédecins du Monde · BEStatistics Belgium · BEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are among the main actors involved in early melanoma diagnosis. However, melanoma diagnostic accuracy and management are reported to be insufficient among GPs in Europe. The primary aim of this observational prospective study was to shed light on melanoma diagnostic practices among French-speaking Belgian GPs. The second aim was to specifically analyse these GPs' pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management. GPs from the five French-speaking districts of Belgium were asked to complete a questionnaire, before taking part in a melanoma diagnostic training session. First, we assessed the GPs' current melanoma diagnostic practices. Then, their pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management were evaluated, through basic theoretical questions and clinical images. These results were subsequently analysed, according to the GPs' sociodemographic characteristics and medical practice type. In total, 89 GPs completed the questionnaire. Almost half of the GPs (43%; CI = [33;54]) were confronted with a suspicious skin lesion as the main reason for consultation once every 3 months, while 33% (CI = [24;43]) were consulted for a suspicious lesion as a secondary reason once a month. Prior to training, one-third of the GPs exhibited suboptimal diagnostic accuracy in at least one of six "life-threatening" clinical cases among two sets of 10 clinical images of pigmented skin lesions, which can lead to inadequate patient management (i.e. incorrect treatment and/or inappropriate reinsurance). This study underlines the need to train GPs in melanoma diagnosis. GPs' pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management should be improved to increase early melanoma detection.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBelgiumHumansProspective StudiesCancer early detectionGeneral practitionersManagementMelanomaObservational study

Identifiers

PMID32448923
OpenAlexW3027314096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.