Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448737›Full record

SynthesisPain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2020

Multidimensional Pain Assessment Tools for Ambulatory and Inpatient Nursing Practice.

Clara Scher, Emily Petti, Lauren Meador, Janet H Van Cleave, Eva Liang, M Carrington Reid

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Management of Gynaecological Chronic Pelvic Pain in the Emergency Setting- A Scoping Review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. CE: Assessing Movement-Evoked Pain.The American journal of nursing · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara ScherDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, New York.
Emily PettiDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lauren MeadorDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Janet H Van CleaveNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York.
Eva LiangNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York.
M Carrington ReidDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: mcr2004@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Reid Aging and Pain Research Training ProgramK24AG053462 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI REID, MANNEY CARRINGTON · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the critical components in pain management is the assessment of pain. Multidimensional measurement tools capture multiple aspects of a patient's pain experience but can be cumbersome to administer in busy clinical settings.

aimWe conducted a systematic review to identify brief multidimensional pain assessment tools that nurses can use in both ambulatory and acute care settings.

methodsWe searched PUBMED/MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases from January 1977 through December 2019. Eligible English-language articles were systematically screened and data were extracted independently by two raters. Main outcomes included the number and types of domains captured by each instrument (e.g., sensory, impact on function, temporal components) and tool characteristics (e.g., administration time, validity) that may affect instrument uptake in practice.

resultsOur search identified eight multidimensional assessment tools, all of which measured sensory or affective qualities of pain and its impact on functioning. Most tools measured impact of pain on affective functioning, mood, or enjoyment of life. One tool used ecological momentary assessment via a web-based app to assess pain symptoms. Time to administer the varying tools ranged from less than 2 minutes to 10 minutes, and evidence of validity was reported for seven of the eight tools.

conclusionsOur review identified eight multidimensional pain measurement tools that nurses can use in ambulatory or acute care settings to capture patients' experience of pain. The most important element in selecting a multidimensional pain measure, though, is that one tool is selected that best fits the practice and is used consistently over time.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesHospitalizationHumansInpatientsNursing CarePain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID32448737
PMCPMC7554114
OpenAlexW3026476561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.