Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448618›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

Obstetrics risk Assessment: Evaluation of selection criteria for vaccine research studies in pregnant women.

Linda O Eckert, Christine E Jones, Alisa Kachikis, Azucena Bardají, Fernanda Tavares Da Silva, Judith Absalon, Caroline E Rouse, Asma Khalil, Clare L Cutland, Sonali Kochhar and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Linda O EckertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Washington, School of Medicine Seattle, WA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: eckert@uw.edu.
Christine E JonesFaculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Alisa KachikisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Washington, School of Medicine Seattle, WA.
Azucena BardajíISGlobal, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernanda Tavares Da SilvaSafety Evaluation and Risk Management, Glaxo SmithKline Biologicals, Wavre, Belgium.
Judith AbsalonVaccines Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, NY, USA.
Caroline E RouseDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Asma KhalilDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. George's Hospital, University of London, London, UK.
Clare L CutlandMedical Research Council, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, African Leadership Iin Vaccinology Expertise, Faculty of Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sonali KochharDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Global Healthcare Consulting, India; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Flor M MunozDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: florm@bcm.edu.
University of Washington · USBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESBaylor College of Medicine · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USPfizer (United States) · USUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17221Medical Research Council MR/R005990/1Medical Research Council MR/R005990/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines designed for use in pregnancy and vaccine trials specifically involving pregnant women are rapidly expanding. One of the key challenges in designing maternal immunization trials is that developing exclusion criteria requires understanding and quantifying the background risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes in the pregnancy being studied, which can occur independent of any intervention and be unrelated to vaccine administration. The Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy (GAIA) project has developed and published case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and evaluation of maternal immunization safety in trials involving pregnant women. Complementing this work, we sought to understand how to best assess obstetric risk of adverse outcomes and differentiate it from the assessment of vaccine safety. Quantification of obstetric risk is based on prior and current obstetric, and maternal medical history. We developed a step-wise approach to evaluate and quantify obstetric and maternal risk factors in pregnancy based on review of published literature and guidelines, and critically assessed these factors in the context of designing inclusion and exclusion criteria for maternal vaccine studies. We anticipate this risk assessment evaluation may assist clinical trialists with study design decisions, including selection of exclusion criteria for vaccine trials involving pregnant women, consideration of sub-group classification, such as high or low risk subjects, or schedule considerations, such as preferred trimester of gestation for an intervention during pregnancy. Additionally, this tool may be utilized in data stratification at time of study analyses.

Indexed as

ObstetricsVaccinesFemaleHumansPatient SelectionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnant PeopleVaccinesClinical researchClinical trialExclusion criteriaInclusion criteriaMaternal immunizationObstetric and neonatal risk factorsPregnant womenVaccineVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID32448618
PMCPMC7211583
OpenAlexW3021873981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.