Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448398›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tsz Ngai Mok, Qiyu He, Soundarya Panneerselavam, Huajun Wang, Huige Hou, Xiaofei Zheng, Jinghua Pan, Jieruo Li

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Arthroscopically assisted arthrodesis of the upper ankle joint].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current concepts in ankle arthrodesis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tsz Ngai MokDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Qiyu HeDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Soundarya PanneerselavamInternational School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, Guangdong, China.
Huajun WangDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Huige HouDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Xiaofei ZhengDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Jinghua PanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. huajanve@foxmail.com.
Jieruo LiDepartment of Sport Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. ilorugaie@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-2332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a growing health concern that affects approximately 27 million people in the USA and is associated with a $185 billion annual cost burden. Choosing between open surgery and arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis is still controversial. This study compared arthroscopic arthrodesis and open surgery by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsFor the systematic review, a literature search was conducted in 4 English databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library) from inception to February 2020. Three prospective cohort studies and 7 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 507 patients with ankle arthritis, were included.

resultsFor fusion rate, the pooled data showed a significantly higher rate of fusion during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p = 0.0010). Regarding estimated blood loss, the pooled data showed significantly less blood loss during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 52.04, 95% CI 14.14 to 89.94, p = 0.007). For tourniquet time, the pooled data showed a shorter tourniquet time during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 22.68, 95% CI 1.92 to 43.43, p = 0.03). For length of hospital stay, the pooled data showed less hospitalisation time for patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.26, p < 0.00001). The pooled data showed better recovery for the patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery at 1 year (WMD 14.73, 95% CI 6.66 to 22.80, p = 0.0003).

conclusionIn conclusion, arthroscopic arthrodesis was associated with a higher fusion rate, smaller estimated blood loss, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of hospitalisation than open surgery.

Indexed as

Ankle JointArthrodesisArthroscopyHumansLength of StayOsteoarthritisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAnkle JointArthrodesisArthroscopyOpen surgery

Identifiers

PMID32448398
PMCPMC7247192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.