Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448374›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

REDUCE (Reviewing long-term antidepressant use by careful monitoring in everyday practice) internet and telephone support to people coming off long-term antidepressants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Tony Kendrick, Adam W A Geraghty, Hannah Bowers, Beth Stuart, Geraldine Leydon, Carl May, Guiqing Yao, Wendy O'Brien, Marta Glowacka, Simone Holley and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acceptability and optimisation of resources to support antidepressant cessation: a qualitative think-aloud study with patients in Australian primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  9. The sense of stopping migraine prophylaxis.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Long-term antidepressant use in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs' views on discontinuation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Tony KendrickPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK. A.R.Kendrick@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381
Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Hannah BowersPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Beth StuartPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Geraldine LeydonPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Carl MayDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Guiqing YaoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Leicester, UK.
Wendy O'BrienPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Marta GlowackaDepartment for Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Simone HolleySchool of Psychology, Building 44 Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Samantha WilliamsPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Shihua ZhuPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Rachel Dewar-HaggartPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Bryan PalmerPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Margaret BellPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Sue CollinsonPrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Imogen FrySchool of Psychology, Building 44 Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, York, UK.
Joanna MoncrieffDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Michael MoorePrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Una MacleodHull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Christopher DowrickInstitute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Southampton · GBFaculty (United Kingdom) · GBBournemouth University · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20004Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-1214-20004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround one in ten adults take antidepressants for depression in England, and their long-term use is increasing. Some need them to prevent relapse, but 30-50% could possibly stop them without relapsing and avoid adverse effects and complications of long-term use. However, stopping is not always easy due to withdrawal symptoms and a fear of relapse of depression. When general practitioners review patients on long-term antidepressants and recommend to those who are suitable to stop the medication, only 6-8% are able to stop. The Reviewing long-term antidepressant use by careful monitoring in everyday practice (REDUCE) research programme aims to identify safe and cost-effective ways of helping patients taking long-term antidepressants taper off treatment when appropriate.

methodsDesign: REDUCE is a two-arm, 1:1 parallel group randomised controlled trial, with randomisation clustered by participating family practices.

settingEngland and north Wales. POPULATION: patients taking antidepressants for longer than 1 year for a first episode of depression or longer than 2 years for repeated episodes of depression who are no longer depressed and want to try to taper off their antidepressant use.

interventionprovision of 'ADvisor' internet programmes to general practitioners or nurse practitioners and to patients designed to support antidepressant withdrawal, plus three patient telephone calls from a psychological wellbeing practitioner. The control arm receives usual care. Blinding of patients, practitioners and researchers is not possible in an open pragmatic trial, but statistical and health economic data analysts will remain blind to allocation. OUTCOME MEASURES: the primary outcome is self-reported nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire at 6 months for depressive symptoms. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: depressive symptoms at other follow-up time points, anxiety, discontinuation of antidepressants, social functioning, wellbeing, enablement, quality of life, satisfaction, and use of health services for costs. SAMPLE SIZE: 402 patients (201 intervention and 201 controls) from 134 general practices recruited over 15-18 months, and followed-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A qualitative process evaluation will be conducted through interviews with 15-20 patients and 15-20 practitioners in each arm to explore why the interventions were effective or not, depending on the results. DISCUSSION: Helping patients reduce and stop antidepressants is often challenging for practitioners and time-consuming for very busy primary care practices. If REDUCE provides evidence showing that access to internet and telephone support enables more patients to stop treatment without increasing depression we will try to implement the intervention throughout the National Health Service, publishing practical guidance for professionals and advice for patients to follow, publicised through patient support groups.

trial registrationISRCTN:12417565. Registered on 7 October 2019.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInternetTelephoneAntidepressive AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionEnglandHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWalesAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantsDeprescribingDepressionDigital interventionDiscontinuationPrimary careWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID32448374
PMCPMC7245840
OpenAlexW3026525101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.