Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448353›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2020

Beyond health system contact: measuring and validating quality of childbirth care indicators in primary level facilities of northern Ethiopia.

Haftom Gebrehiwot Weldearegay, Araya Abrha Medhanyie, Hagos Godefay, Alemayehu Bayray Kahsay

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haftom Gebrehiwot WeldearegayCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia. haftom1224@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-7853
Araya Abrha MedhanyieCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Hagos GodefayTigray Region Health Bureau, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Alemayehu Bayray KahsayCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of quality of health care has been largely overlooked and continues to be a major health system bottleneck in monitoring performance and quality to evaluate progress against defined targets for better decision making. Hence, metrics of maternity care are needed to advance from health service contact alone to content of care. We assessed the accuracy of indicators that describe the quality of basic care for childbirth functions both at the individual level as well as at the population level in Northern Ethiopia.

methodsA validation study was conducted by comparing women's self-reported coverage of maternal and newborn health interventions during intra-partum and immediate postpartum care received in primary level care facilities of Northern Ethiopia against a gold standard of direct observation by a trained third party (n = 478). Sensitivity, specificity and individual-level reporting accuracy via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and inflation factor (IF) to estimate population-level accuracy for each indicator was applied for validity analysis.

findings455(97.5%) of women completed the survey describing health interventions. Thirty-two (43.2%) of the 93-basic quality child birth care indicators that were assessed could be accurately measure at the facility and population level (AUC > 0.60 and 0.75 < IF< 1.25). Few of the valid indicators were: whether women and their companion were greeted respectfully, whether an HIV test was offered, and whether severe bleeding (hemorrhage) was experienced by the woman. An additional 21(28.4%) indicators accurately measure at the facility or individual level, but the indicators under or over estimate at population level. Thirteen other indicators could accurately measure at population level. Eight (8.6%) indicators didn't meet either of the validity criteria.

conclusionWomen were able to accurately report on several indicators of quality for basic child birth care. For those few indicators that required a technical understanding tended to have higher don't know response from the women. Therefore, valid indicators should be included as a potential measurement of quality for the childbirth care process to ensure that essential interventions are delivered.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEthiopiaFemaleGovernment ProgramsHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesPostnatal CarePregnancyContent of child birth and primary level careQualityValidating indicators

Identifiers

PMID32448353
PMCPMC7247130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.