ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020
The one-in-all diagnostic value of
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging signs and the qualitative diagnosis of solitary rib lesions usingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Imaging Review of Pediatric Benign Osteocytic Tumors and Latest Updates on Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Correction to: The one-in-all diagnostic value of 99mTcMDP bone scan combining with singlephoton emission tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging in spinal osteoblastoma.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoblastoma (OB) is an intermediate lesion, which makes the accurate preoperative diagnosis very important.
methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of patients with spinal OB lesions confirmed by pathology and diagnosed with bone scan and SPECT/CT for preoperative diagnosis from January 2008 to December 2018. The uptake levels of OB on planar bone scan were divided into low, medium, and high groups by visual assessment referring to the uptake of the normal rib, spine, and bladder. X-ray, CT, MRI, bone scan, and SPECT/CT imaging of the patients were analyzed for characteristics summary.
resultsTwenty-five patients were diagnosed for spinal OB (17 males and 8 females with a proportion of 2.1:1), and the average age was 26.8 ± 10.8 years (range 5~59). There were 8 lesions located in the cervical, 6 in the thoracic, and 11 in the lumbar vertebrae. Twenty-four lesions involved posterior elements, especially the pedicles (14/25). Symptoms were predominantly painful with a duration of 18.3 ± 13.9 months (range 0.5~60 months). The lesion size ranged from 9 to 35 mm. All the lesions were low to high uptake in the planar bone scan, and the percentages of low to high levels were 1 (4%), 8 (32%), and 16 (64%) cases.
conclusionsSpinal OB mainly involved the posterior area, and elderly patients should be considered as well. SPECT/CT combined the characteristics of bone uptake and anatomical features of bone tumors, proving its one-in-all diagnostic value for spinal OB and other osteogenic tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.