ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
VADR: validation and annotation of virus sequence submissions to GenBank.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection of coronaviruses in insectivorous bats of Fore-Caucasus, 2021.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant re-emerges in US farmed mink and free-ranging white-tailed deer in 2022-2023.Nature communications · 2026Article
- VICAST: An Integrated Toolkit for Viral Genome Annotation Curation and Low-Frequency Variant Analysis in Passage Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Overcoming host restrictions to enable continuous passaging of GII.3 human norovirus in human intestinal enteroids.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Programmable fluorescent aptamer-based RNA switches for rapid identification of point mutations.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Metagenomic identification, isolation, and complete genome characterization of two novel picornaviruses in wild duck from Northeastern Siberia.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Large-Scale Saliva-Based Clinical Surveillance Enables Real Time SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Detection and Genomic Tracking (Arizona, 2020-2023).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- VITALdb: to select the best viroinformatics tools for a desired virus or application.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Automated annotation and validation of human respiratory virus sequences using VADR.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- WaveSeekerNet: accurate prediction of influenza A virus subtypes and host source using attention-based deep learning.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Computational tools and data integration to accelerate vaccine development: challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Influenza sequence validation and annotation using VADR.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- GenBase: A Nucleotide Sequence Database.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Article
- UnCoVar: a reproducible and scalable workflow for transparent and robust virus variant calling and lineage assignment using SARS-CoV-2 as an example.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Correlation between the gut microbiome and neurodegenerative diseases: a review of metagenomics evidence.Neural regeneration research · 2024Review
- Influenza sequence validation and annotation using VADR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenBank contains over 3 million viral sequences. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) previously made available a tool for validating and annotating influenza virus sequences that is used to check submissions to GenBank. Before this project, there was no analogous tool in use for non-influenza viral sequence submissions.
resultsWe developed a system called VADR (Viral Annotation DefineR) that validates and annotates viral sequences in GenBank submissions. The annotation system is based on the analysis of the input nucleotide sequence using models built from curated RefSeqs. Hidden Markov models are used to classify sequences by determining the RefSeq they are most similar to, and feature annotation from the RefSeq is mapped based on a nucleotide alignment of the full sequence to a covariance model. Predicted proteins encoded by the sequence are validated with nucleotide-to-protein alignments using BLAST. The system identifies 43 types of "alerts" that (unlike the previous BLAST-based system) provide deterministic and rigorous feedback to researchers who submit sequences with unexpected characteristics. VADR has been integrated into GenBank's submission processing pipeline allowing for viral submissions passing all tests to be accepted and annotated automatically, without the need for any human (GenBank indexer) intervention. Unlike the previous submission-checking system, VADR is freely available (https://github.com/nawrockie/vadr) for local installation and use. VADR has been used for Norovirus submissions since May 2018 and for Dengue virus submissions since January 2019. Since March 2020, VADR has also been used to check SARS-CoV-2 sequence submissions. Other viruses with high numbers of submissions will be added incrementally.
conclusionVADR improves the speed with which non-flu virus submissions to GenBank can be checked and improves the content and quality of the GenBank annotations. The availability and portability of the software allow researchers to run the GenBank checks prior to submitting their viral sequences, and thereby gain confidence that their submissions will be accepted immediately without the need to correspond with GenBank staff. Reciprocally, the adoption of VADR frees GenBank staff to spend more time on services other than checking routine viral sequence submissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.