Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448074›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of left ventricular function during the full cardiac cycle.

J O Campos, J Sundnes, R W Dos Santos, B M Rocha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bayesian optimisation for efficient parameter inference in a cardiac mechanics model of the left ventricle.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polygonal surface processing and mesh generation tools for the numerical simulation of the cardiac function.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The fickle heart: uncertainty quantification in cardiac and cardiovascular modelling and simulation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J O CamposCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Leopoldina, Brazil.
J SundnesSimula Research Laboratory, PO Box 134 1325 Lysaker, Norway.
R W Dos SantosGraduate Program in Computational Modeling, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
B M RochaGraduate Program in Computational Modeling, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRSimula Research Laboratory · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific computer simulations can be a powerful tool in clinical applications, helping in diagnostics and the development of new treatments. However, its practical use depends on the reliability of the models. The construction of cardiac simulations involves several steps with inherent uncertainties, including model parameters, the generation of personalized geometry and fibre orientation assignment, which are semi-manual processes subject to errors. Thus, it is important to quantify how these uncertainties impact model predictions. The present work performs uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analyses to assess the variability in important quantities of interest (QoI). Clinical quantities are analysed in terms of overall variability and to identify which parameters are the major contributors. The analyses are performed for simulations of the left ventricle function during the entire cardiac cycle. Uncertainties are incorporated in several model parameters, including regional wall thickness, fibre orientation, passive material parameters, active stress and the circulatory model. The results show that the QoI are very sensitive to active stress, wall thickness and fibre direction, where ejection fraction and ventricular torsion are the most impacted outputs. Thus, to improve the precision of models of cardiac mechanics, new methods should be considered to decrease uncertainties associated with geometrical reconstruction, estimation of active stress and of fibre orientation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification in cardiac and cardiovascular modelling and simulation'.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularUncertaintyVentricular Function, LeftBiomechanical PhenomenaSystolecardiac mechanicssensitivity analysisuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID32448074
PMCPMC7287338
OpenAlexW3026131914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.