Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448072›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Gaussian process manifold interpolation for probabilistic atrial activation maps and uncertain conduction velocity.

Sam Coveney, Cesare Corrado, Caroline H Roney, Daniel O'Hare, Steven E Williams, Mark D O'Neill, Steven A Niederer, Richard H Clayton, Jeremy E Oakley, Richard D Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Manifold Approximating Graph Interpolation of Cardiac Local Activation Time.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Applications of multimodality imaging for left atrial catheter ablation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Learning atrial fiber orientations and conductivity tensors from intracardiac maps using physics-informed neural networks.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. PIEMAP: Personalized Inverse Eikonal Model from cardiac Electro-Anatomical Maps.Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart. STACOM (Workshop) · 2021
    Article
  17. The fickle heart: uncertainty quantification in cardiac and cardiovascular modelling and simulation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sam CoveneyInsigneo Institute for in-silico medicine and Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Cesare CorradoDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Caroline H RoneyDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Daniel O'HareDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Steven E WilliamsDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Mark D O'NeillDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Steven A NiedererDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard H ClaytonInsigneo Institute for in-silico medicine and Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jeremy E OakleySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Richard D WilkinsonSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/26/34952British Heart Foundation PG/13/37/30280British Heart Foundation PG/15/91/31812Medical Research Council MR/S015086/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with atrial fibrillation, local activation time (LAT) maps are routinely used for characterizing patient pathophysiology. The gradient of LAT maps can be used to calculate conduction velocity (CV), which directly relates to material conductivity and may provide an important measure of atrial substrate properties. Including uncertainty in CV calculations would help with interpreting the reliability of these measurements. Here, we build upon a recent insight into reduced-rank Gaussian processes (GPs) to perform probabilistic interpolation of uncertain LAT directly on human atrial manifolds. Our Gaussian process manifold interpolation (GPMI) method accounts for the topology of the atrium, and allows for calculation of statistics for predicted CV. We demonstrate our method on two clinical cases, and perform validation against a simulated ground truth. CV uncertainty depends on data density, wave propagation direction and CV magnitude. GPMI is suitable for probabilistic interpolation of other uncertain quantities on non-Euclidean manifolds. This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification in cardiac and cardiovascular modelling and simulation'.

Indexed as

Atrial FunctionModels, CardiovascularAtrial FibrillationHeart AtriaHeart Conduction SystemHumansNormal DistributionProbabilityatrial fibrillationcardiac conduction velocityGaussian processlocal activation timemanifoldprobabilistic interpolation

Identifiers

PMID32448072
PMCPMC7287339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.