Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448071›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Predicting left ventricular contractile function via Gaussian process emulation in aortic-banded rats.

S Longobardi, A Lewalle, S Coveney, I Sjaastad, E K S Espe, W E Louch, C J Musante, A Sher, S A Niederer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S LongobardiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
A LewalleSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
S CoveneyInsigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine and Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
I SjaastadInstitute for Experimental Medical Research and KG Jebsen Center for Cardiac Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
E K S EspeInstitute for Experimental Medical Research and KG Jebsen Center for Cardiac Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
W E LouchInstitute for Experimental Medical Research and KG Jebsen Center for Cardiac Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
C J MusantePfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Cambridge, MA, USA.
A SherPfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Cambridge, MA, USA.
S A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOPfizer (United States) · USInsigneo · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/19/44/34368British Heart Foundation SP/18/6/33805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac contraction is the result of integrated cellular, tissue and organ function. Biophysical

Indexed as

aortic-banded ratGaussian processglobal sensitivity analysishistory matchingthree-dimensional bi-ventricular model

Identifiers

PMID32448071
PMCPMC7287330
OpenAlexW3026223623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.