Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32448009›Full record

ReviewIntegrative cancer therapies

Does Baking Soda Function as a Magic Bullet for Patients With Cancer? A Mini Review.

Mengyuan Yang, Xian Zhong, Ying Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Dietary baking soda (NaHCORenal failure · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dichloroacetate for Cancer Treatment: Some Facts and Many Doubts.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Bioinorganic Modulators of Ferroptosis: A Review of Recent Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Effect of Exogenous pH on Cell Growth of Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengyuan YangThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xian ZhongThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5915-5531
Ying YuanThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3922-9553
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sodium bicarbonate, commonly known as baking soda, is widely used in the clinic as an antacid for treating gastric hyperacidity, among other conditions. Chao et al have reported a clinical trial about targeting intratumor lactic acidosis-transarterial chemoembolization. Based on conventional transarterial chemoembolization, the authors added a 5% sodium bicarbonate solution to cytotoxic drugs, resulting in a high local control rate. The explanation for the antitumor effects of sodium bicarbonate is related to acidosis in the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarize the findings from studies administering sodium bicarbonate alone or in combination with other anticancer therapies as cancer treatments, and discuss methods for safe and effective use of sodium bicarbonate in the clinic.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticNeoplasmsSodium BicarbonateHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationTumor MicroenvironmentSodium Bicarbonateanimal experimentsreviewsodium bicarbonateTILA-TACEtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32448009
PMCPMC7249593
OpenAlexW3028333902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.