Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32447575›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Feasibility of eccentric overloading and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve muscle strength and muscle mass after treatment for head and neck cancer.

Colin Lavigne, Rosie Twomey, Harold Lau, George Francis, S Nicole Culos-Reed, Guillaume Y Millet

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Objective measurement of cancer-related fatigue.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Colin LavigneFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Rosie TwomeyFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Harold LauDepartment of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
George FrancisDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
S Nicole Culos-ReedFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Guillaume Y MilletFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. guillaume.millet@univ-st-etienne.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-0762
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) results in severe weight loss, mainly due to the loss of lean body mass. Consequently, decreases in muscular strength and health-related quality of life (HRQL) occur. This study investigated the feasibility of a 12-week novel strength training (NST) and conventional strength training (CST) intervention delivered after HNC treatment.

methodsParticipants were randomized to a NST group (n = 11) involving eccentric overloaded strength training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), or a CST group (n = 11) involving dynamic resistance exercises matched for training volume. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, completion, adherence, and evidence of progression. A neuromuscular assessment involving maximal isometric voluntary contractions (MIVCs) in the knee extensors was evaluated prior to and during incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion at baseline and after the interventions. Anthropometrics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also assessed.

resultsAlthough recruitment was challenging, completion was 100% in NST and 82% in CST. Adherence was 92% in NST and 81% in CST. Overall, MIVC increased by 19 ± 23%, muscle cross-sectional area improved 18 ± 22%, cycling exercise time improved by 18 ± 13%, and improvements in HRQL and fatigue were clinically relevant.

conclusionsBoth interventions were found to be feasible for HNC patients after treatment. Strength training significantly improved maximal muscle strength, muscle cross-sectional area, and PROs after HNC treatment. Future research should include fully powered trials and consider the use of eccentric overloading and NMES during HNC treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Eccentric- and NMES-emphasized strength training may be useful alternatives to conventional strength training after HNC treatment.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyCancer SurvivorsElectric StimulationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle WeaknessQuadriceps MuscleQuality of LifeResistance TrainingCancer rehabilitationElectromyostimulationExercise oncology

Identifiers

PMID32447575
OpenAlexW3027221992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.