Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32447555›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2020

Pre-Seeding of Simple Electrospun Scaffolds with a Combination of Endothelial Cells and Fibroblasts Strongly Promotes Angiogenesis.

Serkan Dikici, Frederik Claeyssens, Sheila MacNeil

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Developing Wound Dressings Using 2-deoxy-International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serkan DikiciTissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, North Campus Broad Lane, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9933-5254
Frederik ClaeyssensTissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, North Campus Broad Lane, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK.
Sheila MacNeilTissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, North Campus Broad Lane, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK. s.macneil@sheffield.ac.uk.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntroduction of pro-angiogenic cells into tissue-engineered (TE) constructs (prevascularisation) is a promising approach to overcome delayed neovascularisation of such constructs post-implantation. Accordingly, in this study, we examined the contribution of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) alone and in combination on the formation of new blood vessels in ex-ovo chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay.

methodsPoly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) and polycaprolactone (PCL) were first examined in terms of their physical, mechanical, and biological performances. The effect of gelatin coating and co-culture conditions on enhancing endothelial cell viability and growth was then investigated. Finally, the angiogenic potential of HDMECs and HDFs were assessed macroscopically and histologically after seeding on simple electrospun PHBV scaffolds either in isolation or in indirect co-culture using an ex-ovo CAM assay.

resultsThe results demonstrated that PHBV was slightly more favourable than PCL for HDMECs in terms of cell metabolic activity. The gelatin coating of PHBV scaffolds and co-culture of HDMECs with HDFs both showed a positive impact on HDMECs viability and growth. Both cell types induced angiogenesis over 7 days in the CAM assay either in isolation or in co-culture. The introduction of HDMECs to the scaffolds resulted in the production of more blood vessels in the area of implantation than the introduction of HDFs, but the co-culture of HDMECs and HDFs gave the most significant angiogenic activity.

conclusionOur findings showed that the in vitro prevascularisation of TE constructs with HDMECs and HDFs alone or in co-culture promotes angiogenesis in implantable TE constructs.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsChorioallantoic MembraneFibroblastsHumansTissue EngineeringAngiogenesisChick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assayEndothelial cellsNeovascularisationPrevascularisation

Identifiers

PMID32447555
PMCPMC7392995
OpenAlexW3026988301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.