Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32447531›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Subsidence after total lumbar disc replacement is predictable and related to clinical outcome.

J Kitzen, V Verbiest, I Buil, M G M Schotanus, B van Rietbergen, S M J van Kuijk, L W van Rhijn, P C P H Willems

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frailty is not an independent risk factor for worse clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery: a prospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J KitzenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. j.kitzen@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0417-8052
V VerbiestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
I BuilDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
M G M SchotanusDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
B van RietbergenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
S M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
L W van RhijnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P C P H WillemsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs yet, there are no studies describing a relationship between radiographic subsidence after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) and patient symptoms. To investigate if subsidence, in terms of penetrated bone volume or angular rotation over time (ΔPBV and ΔAR), is related to clinical outcome. To assess if subsidence can be predicted by position implant asymmetry (IA) or relative size of the TDR, areal undersizing index (AUI) on direct post-operative radiographs.

methodsRetrospective cohort study consists of 209 consecutive patients with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease. A three-dimensional graphical representation of the implant in relation to the bony endplates was created on conventional radiographs. Consequently, the PBV, AR, IA and AUI were calculated, direct post-operative (DPO) and at last follow-up (LFU). For clinical evaluation, patients with substantial pain (VAS ≥ 50) and malfunction (ODI ≥ 40) were considered failures.

resultsAt a mean follow-up of 16.7 years, 152 patients (73%) were available for analysis. In 32 patients, revision by spinal fusion had been performed. Both ΔAR (4.33° vs. 1.83°, p = 0.019) and ΔPBV (1448.4 mm

conclusionSubsidence of a TDR is associated with a worse clinical outcome. The occurrence of subsidence is higher in case of incorrect placement or shape mismatch.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationJoint ProsthesisLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionTotal Disc ReplacementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic low back painDegenerative disc diseaseLumbar spineMalpositionmigration or subsidenceTotal disc replacement

Identifiers

PMID32447531
OpenAlexW3028431367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.