First-line treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and discontinuation of pessary treatment.

introductionThe primary objective of this study was to investigate the percentages of women choosing watchful waiting, pessary use or surgery as first-line treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Second, the rate and cause of discontinuation of pessary use were investigated.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on 794 patients referred with POP at a Danish tertiary center for urogynecology at Aalborg University Hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015. The following data were registered: age, BMI, previous use of a pessary, total number of births, vaginal births, cesarean sections, previous hysterectomy, prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery, smoking, menopause, sexual status and POP-Q stage in the three vaginal compartments. Pessary treatments were evaluated after 3 months. Additional visits, reason for discontinuation and secondary treatment were noted.

resultsFirst-line treatment was surgery in 50%, watchful waiting in 33% and pessary use in 17% of patients. Characteristics associated with choosing surgery instead of a pessary were age < 65 years, previous prolapse surgery, prolapse in the anterior or posterior compartment, and POP-Q stage > 2. Characteristics associated with choosing watchful waiting instead of a pessary were age < 65 years and prolapse in the posterior compartment. A total of 33% discontinued pessary treatment within the first 3 months. Discontinuation was associated with age < 65 years, previous hysterectomy and pelvic surgery, and additional visits. Expulsion of the pessary and pain/discomfort were the main causes of discontinuation.

conclusionThis study showed that 50% of patients referred with POP were treated with conservative treatment (watchful waiting and pessary) and thus more women could probably be treated in primary care.