Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32447414›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Soleen Ghafoor, Anton S Becker, Daniel Stocker, Borna K Barth, Daniel Eberli, Olivio F Donati, Hebert Alberto Vargas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Soleen Ghafoor *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, USA. ghafoors@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-7363
Anton S BeckerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, USA.
Daniel Stocker *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Borna K BarthInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel EberliDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Olivio F Donati *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hebert Alberto Vargas *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For clinically significant, locally confined prostate cancer, whole-gland radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are established effective treatment strategies that, however, come at a cost of significant morbidity related to urinary and sexual side effects. The concept of risk stratification paired with a better understanding of prognostic factors has led to the development of alternative management options including active surveillance and focal therapy for appropriately selected patients with localized disease. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one such minimally invasive, image-guided treatment option for prostate cancer. Due to the relative novelty of HIFU and the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer, many radiologists are not yet familiar with imaging findings related to HIFU, their temporal evolution as well as imaging appearance of recurrent disease after this type of focal therapy. HIFU induces sharply demarcated, localized coagulative necrosis of a tumor through thermal energy delivered via an endorectal or transurethral ultrasound transducer. In this pictorial review, we aim at providing relevant background information that will guide the reader through the general principles of HIFU in the prostate, as well as demonstrate the imaging appearance of expected post-HIFU changes versus recurrent tumor.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatectomyTreatment OutcomeFocal therapyHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32447414
OpenAlexW3026377339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.