ArticlePsychiatry research. Neuroimaging2020
A bayesian approach to examining default mode network functional connectivity and cognitive performance in major depressive disorder.
Article in Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Group-level comparison of brain connectivity networks.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To reconcile the inconsistency of the association between the resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) and cognitive performance in healthy and depressed groups due to high variance of both measures, we proposed a Bayesian spatio-temporal model to precisely and accurately estimate the RSFC in depressed and nondepressed participants. This model was employed to estimate spatially-adjusted functional connectivity (saFC) in the extended default mode network (DMN) that was hypothesized to correlate with cognitive performance in both depressed and nondepressed. Multiple linear regression models were used to study the relationship between DMN saFC and cognitive performance scores measured in the following four cognitive domains while adjusting for age, sex, and education. In ROI pairs including the posterior cingulate (PCC) and anterior cingulate (ACC) cortex regions, the relationship between connectivity and cognition was found only with the Bayesian approach. Moreover, only the Bayesian approach was able to detect a significant diagnostic difference in the association in ROI pairs, including both PCC and ACC regions, due to smaller variance for the saFC estimator. The results confirm that a reliable and precise saFC estimator, based on the Bayesian model, can foster scientific discovery that may not be feasible with the conventional ROI-based FC estimator (denoted as 'AVG-FC').
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.