ArticleJournal of clinical anesthesia2020
VV-ECMO usage in ARDS due to COVID-19: Clinical, practical and ethical considerations.
Article in Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19.Critical care clinics · 2022Review
- Critical care during a pandemic -Are we prepared for the ethical dilemma?Journal of critical care · 2022Article
- A multidisciplinary approach to prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus 2019-case report.AME case reports · 2022Article
- Mortality Risk Assessment in COVID-19 Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Retrospective Study of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients With and Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Wuhan, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Case Report: Respiratory Management With a 47-Day ECMO Support for a Critical Patient With COVID-19.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Effects of prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure: a systematic review.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.