Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32446905›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020

Challenges of Developing a Natural Language Processing Method With Electronic Health Records to Identify Persons With Chronic Mobility Disability.

Nicole D Agaronnik, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri, Wei He, Lisa I Iezzoni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole D AgaronnikHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Charlotta LindvallDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Areej El-JawahriDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Wei HeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lisa I IezzoniHealth Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: liezzoni@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Exploring Timeliness of Cancer Diagnoses in Persons with Significant Physical DisabilityR21HD095240 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IEZZONI, LISA I. · 2018 to 2019
$463k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD095240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the utility of applying natural language processing (NLP) to electronic health records (EHRs) to identify individuals with chronic mobility disability.

designWe used EHRs from the Research Patient Data Repository, which contains EHRs from a large Massachusetts health care delivery system. This analysis was part of a larger study assessing the effects of disability on diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We applied NLP text extraction software to longitudinal EHRs of colorectal cancer patients to identify persons who use a wheelchair (our indicator of mobility disability for this analysis). We manually reviewed the clinical notes identified by NLP using directed content analysis to identify true cases using wheelchairs, duration or chronicity of use, and documentation quality.

settingEHRs from large health care delivery system

participantsPatients (N=14,877) 21-75 years old who were newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2017.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresConfirmation of patients' chronic wheelchair use in NLP-flagged notes; quality of disability documentation.

resultsWe identified 14,877 patients with colorectal cancer with 303,182 associated clinical notes. NLP screening identified 1482 (0.5%) notes that contained 1+ wheelchair-associated keyword. These notes were associated with 420 patients (2.8% of colorectal cancer population). Of the 1482 notes, 286 (19.3%, representing 105 patients, 0.7% of the total) contained documentation of reason for wheelchair use and duration. Directed content analysis identified 3 themes concerning disability documentation: (1) wheelchair keywords used in specific EHR contexts; (2) reason for wheelchair not clearly stated; and (3) duration of wheelchair use not consistently documented.

conclusionsNLP offers an option to screen for patients with chronic mobility disability in much less time than required by manual chart review. Nonetheless, manual chart review must confirm that flagged patients have chronic mobility disability (are not false positives). Notes, however, often have inadequate disability documentation.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesWheelchairsYoung AdultElectronic health recordsMachine learningNatural language processingRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32446905
PMCPMC7529728
OpenAlexW3026439258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.