Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32446037›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2020

COVID-19 identification in chest X-ray images on flat and hierarchical classification scenarios.

Rodolfo M Pereira, Diego Bertolini, Lucas O Teixeira, Carlos N Silla, Yandre M G Costa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
50.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 526 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodolfo M PereiraInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Paraná (IFPR), Pinhais, PR, Brazil; Pontifícia Universidade Catalica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Electronic address: rodolfomp123@gmail.com.
Diego BertoliniUniversidade Tecnologica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Campo Mourão, PR, Brazil; Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Lucas O TeixeiraUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Carlos N SillaPontifícia Universidade Catalica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Yandre M G CostaUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe COVID-19 can cause severe pneumonia and is estimated to have a high impact on the healthcare system. Early diagnosis is crucial for correct treatment in order to possibly reduce the stress in the healthcare system. The standard image diagnosis tests for pneumonia are chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scan. Although CT scan is the gold standard, CXR are still useful because it is cheaper, faster and more widespread. This study aims to identify pneumonia caused by COVID-19 from other types and also healthy lungs using only CXR images.

methodsIn order to achieve the objectives, we have proposed a classification schema considering the following perspectives: i) a multi-class classification; ii) hierarchical classification, since pneumonia can be structured as a hierarchy. Given the natural data imbalance in this domain, we also proposed the use of resampling algorithms in the schema in order to re-balance the classes distribution. We observed that, texture is one of the main visual attributes of CXR images, our classification schema extract features using some well-known texture descriptors and also using a pre-trained CNN model. We also explored early and late fusion techniques in the schema in order to leverage the strength of multiple texture descriptors and base classifiers at once. To evaluate the approach, we composed a database, named RYDLS-20, containing CXR images of pneumonia caused by different pathogens as well as CXR images of healthy lungs. The classes distribution follows a real-world scenario in which some pathogens are more common than others.

resultsThe proposed approach tested in RYDLS-20 achieved a macro-avg F1-Score of 0.65 using a multi-class approach and a F1-Score of 0.89 for the COVID-19 identification in the hierarchical classification scenario.

conclusionsAs far as we know, the top identification rate obtained in this paper is the best nominal rate obtained for COVID-19 identification in an unbalanced environment with more than three classes. We must also highlight the novel proposed hierarchical classification approach for this task, which considers the types of pneumonia caused by the different pathogens and lead us to the best COVID-19 recognition rate obtained here.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDatabases, FactualDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRadiography, ThoracicSARS-CoV-2SoftwareChest X-rayCOVID-19Medical image analysisPneumoniaTexture

Identifiers

PMID32446037
PMCPMC7207172
OpenAlexW3021001507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.