Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32445942›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental research2020

Environmental exposures and breast cancer risk in the context of underlying susceptibility: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature.

Nur Zeinomar, Sabine Oskar, Rebecca D Kehm, Shamin Sahebzeda, Mary Beth Terry

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nur ZeinomarDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sabine OskarDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Shamin SahebzedaDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: mt146@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001875 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SPANN, MARISA N, TAYLOR, JACQUELYN Y · 2016 to 2025
$8.9M
Pregnancy and Prenatal PAHs and other Environmental Exposures and Breast CancerU01ES026122 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, RACHEL L, TERRY, MARY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$4.5M
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY/BIOSTATISTICS/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEST32CA009529 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 1985 to 2012
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001875NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009529NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES026122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence evaluating environmental chemical exposures (ECE) and breast cancer (BC) risk is heterogeneous which may stem in part as few studies measure ECE during key BC windows of susceptibility (WOS). Another possibility may be that most BC studies are skewed towards individuals at average risk, which may limit the ability to detect signals from ECE.

objectivesWe reviewed the literature on ECE and BC focusing on three types of studies or subgroup analyses based on higher absolute BC risk: BC family history (Type 1); early onset BC (Type 2); and/or genetic susceptibility (Type 3).

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed database to identify epidemiologic studies examining ECE and BC risk published through June 1, 2019.

resultsWe identified 100 publications in 56 unique epidemiologic studies. Of these 56 studies, only 2 (3.6%) were enriched with BC family history and only 11% of studies (6/56) were specifically enriched with early onset cases. 80% of the publications from these 8 enriched studies (Type 1: 8/10 publications; Type 2: 8/10 publications) supported a statistically significant association between ECE and BC risk including studies of PAH, indoor cooking, NO DISCUSSION: Studies enriched for women at higher BC risk through family history, younger age of onset and/or genetic susceptibility consistently support an association between an ECE and BC risk. In addition to measuring exposures during WOS, designing studies that are enriched with women at higher absolute risk are necessary to robustly measure the role of ECE on BC risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsCookingFemaleHumansPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsEnvironmental PollutantsPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsBreast cancerEarly onset breast cancerEnvironmental contaminantsFamily historyGene-environment interaction

Identifiers

PMID32445942
PMCPMC7314105
OpenAlexW3011703283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.