Trial reportHeadache2020
Effect of Fremanezumab Monthly and Quarterly Doses on Efficacy Responses.
Trial report in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Study of Fremanezumab Administered Subcutaneously Using an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2021Trial
- Exposure-Response Modeling of Monthly Migraine Days for Efficacy of Atogepant in Patients With Episodic or Chronic Migraine.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Fremanezumab for the treatment of migraine.Pain management · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and safety of monthly versus quarterly fremanezumab for migraine prevention: An Italian, multicenter, real-life study.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- What to do with non-responders to CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies: switch to another or move to gepants?The journal of headache and pain · 2023Article
- Fremanezumab for Episodic Migraine Prevention in Japanese Patients: Subgroup Analysis from Two International Trials.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Review
- Fremanezumab: a disease-specific option for the preventive treatment of migraine, including difficult-to-treat migraine.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExposure-response (E-R) models were developed to provide a description of the time-course of treatment effect for monthly and quarterly dosing regimens of fremanezumab.
backgroundFremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody for preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). In phase 2b and 3 clinical studies of fremanezumab, significant reductions in migraine and headache days and other clinical endpoints were observed for patients with EM and patients with CM. Development of E-R models relating individual-specific measures of drug exposure to clinical endpoints provides a more granular understanding of the expected effects of different doses on therapeutic outcomes by accounting for variability in pharmacokinetic (PK) properties.
methodsData from 2 phase 2b and 2 phase 3 studies of adults with EM or CM were used. Individual exposures were calculated from a population PK model and related to monthly migraine days in EM and moderate-severe (M/S) headache days in CM. Model-based stochastic simulations were performed to compare predicted responses for the various treatment regimens.
resultsThe effect of average fremanezumab concentration compared to placebo on the reduction in migraine days and M/S headache days was predicted by the models to be similar for 225 mg monthly and 675 mg once quarterly over time for both EM and CM patients. Both regimens were associated with better response than placebo. A similar percent of EM and CM responders was predicted across the range of observed body weights.
conclusionsExposure-response evaluations showed that both monthly (225 mg) and quarterly (675 mg) fremanezumab dosing regimens were appropriate in achieving clinical benefit in adult patients with EM or CM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.