Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32445157›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

Combinations of cactus pear with different roughage sources on the production, chemical composition, and milk fatty acid profile of F1 Holstein/Zebu cows.

Camila Soares, Vicente Ribeiro Rocha Júnior, Flávio Pinto Monção, Lucas Daniel Alcântara Borges, Luciana Albuquerque Caldeira, Natanael Mendes Costa, José Reinaldo Mendes Ruas, João Paulo Sampaio Rigueira, Cinara da Cunha Siqueira Carvalho, Eleuza Clarete Junqueira de Sales and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camila SoaresDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Vicente Ribeiro Rocha JúniorDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Flávio Pinto MonçãoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil. moncaomoncao@yahoo.com.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-0107
Lucas Daniel Alcântara BorgesDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Luciana Albuquerque CaldeiraDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Natanael Mendes CostaDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
José Reinaldo Mendes RuasDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
João Paulo Sampaio RigueiraDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Cinara da Cunha Siqueira CarvalhoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Eleuza Clarete Junqueira de SalesDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Daniel Ananias de Assis PiresDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.
Julieta Maria Alencar ChamoneDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, State University of Montes Claros, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, Janauba, Minas Gerais, 2630, Brazil.

Funding

Capes 00000Capes 000000Capes 0000000Epamig 000000FAPEMIG 0000000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The qualities of food, mainly of animal origin, have always been of concern to consumers. It is known that the composition of animals' diets can influence the composition of the foods produced, such as milk. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate diets with cactus pear in combination with different forages for F1 Holstein/Zebu cows on the chemical composition and fatty acid profile of milk. Two simultaneous 4 × 4 Latin squares were used in the experimental design. Four experimental diets were used: Diet 1, sorghum silage as the only roughage; Diet 2, sorghum silage combined with cactus pear in a proportion of 50% of the roughage (dry matter basis); Diet 3, elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Roxo) as the only roughage; and Diet 4, elephant grass combined with cactus pear in a proportion of 50% of the roughage. The roughage:concentrate ratio was 75:25. The milk urea nitrogen was higher (16.08 mg/dL) in the milk of cows fed the diet with only elephant grass than that of milk from the other diet groups. The other analyzed variables of the chemical composition of milk were not influenced by the diets. However, there was a change in the sum of the saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids. The content of C16:0 fatty acid was higher and that of C18:0 was lower in the milk of cows fed the cactus pear diets than in that of cows fed the other diets. Higher levels of oleic acid were observed in the milk of cows fed with diets containing elephant grass than those in the milk of the cows in the sorghum forage groups. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) was higher in the milk of cows fed cactus pear than in that of the other cows. The combination of cactus pear with elephant grass or sorghum silage in the diet did not alter the chemical composition of milk. However, it influenced the fatty acid profile.

Indexed as

CattleOpuntiaAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary FiberFatty AcidsFemaleLactationMilkSorghumZea maysDietary FiberFatty AcidsChemical compositionConjugated linoleic acidFatty acidsLactating cows

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.