ArticleDysphagia2021
Whiplash-Associated Dysphagia and Dysphonia: A Scoping Review.
Article in Dysphagia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shape modelling of the oropharynx distinguishes associations with body morphology but not whiplash-associated disorder.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swallowing and voice complaints after a whiplash injury have been observed and reported in several studies; however, variability in study design complicates current understanding of whether dysphagia and dysphonia should be recognised as potential adverse outcomes. A scoping review was conducted across six databases from 1950 to March 2019. A total of 18 studies were included for review. Data regarding study purpose, design, outcome measures, participant characteristics and outcomes reported were extracted. Level of evidence (LOE) was assessed by the American Speech-Language Language Association (ASHA)'s LOE system. All studies were exploratory, with 68% rated as poor (< 3) on quality ratings. Nearly half (n = 6) were single case reports. Only three studies investigated some type of swallow-related outcome specifically within the study aim/s. Incidence of swallow-related problems ranged from 2 to 29%, with unspecified complaints of "swallowing difficulty", "dysphagia" and fatigue and pain whilst chewing reported. Neither swallowing biomechanics nor the underlying pathophysiology of swallow or voice complaints was investigated in any study. Four case studies presented post-whiplash voice complaints; two of which described loss of pitch range. Others described hoarseness, loss of control and weak phonation. Most studies only mentioned swallow- or voice-related deficits when reporting a wider set of post-injury symptomatology and six did not describe the outcome measure used to identify the swallow and voice-related problems reported. The existing literature is limited and of low quality, contributing to an unclear picture of the true incidence and underlying mechanisms of whiplash-related dysphagia and dysphonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32445061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.