ReviewInternational orthopaedics2020
Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: a review of best practices.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurring low statistical robustness in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of 84 fragility index studies.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- A Challenge to In-Person Academic Conferences During the Climate Emergency.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2025Article
- Ethical conference economies? Reimagining the costs of convening academic communities when moving online.The Geographical journal · 2024Article
- Leveraging digital assets: lessons from a 14-year-old isotope tracer course for professional scientists.Advances in physiology education · 2024Article
- Going virtual: mixed methods evaluation of online versus in-person learning in the NIH mixed methods research training program retreat.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Using Twitter (X) to Mobilize Knowledge for First Contact Physiotherapists: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Considerations for Planning Effective and Appealing Advisory Boards and Other Small-Group Meetings with Health Care Providers: Importance of Participant Preferences.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Article
- Assessing the success of a research leadership programme for senior nurses and midwives: A mixed methods programme evaluation.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Voices of conference attendees: how should future hybrid conferences be designed?BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Description of the Permanent Continuing Education Seminars of the Health Education System for Well-beingRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Web-Based International Journal Club for Ketamine in Psychiatric Disorders: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- Strategies for Improving Enrollment of Diverse Populations with a Focus on Lipid-Lowering Clinical Trials.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross-sectional study.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023Article
- Retrospective Study of Healthcare Resources Developed for Patients by Interprofessional Teams.Cureus · 2023Article
- Understanding psychology students' perspective on video psychotherapy and their intention to offer it after graduation: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Virtual conferences: results of an international survey on radiologist preferences and perspectives.European radiology · 2022Article
- 'What about the coffee break?': Designing virtual conference spaces for conviviality.Geo : geography and environment · 2022Article
- Promoting Gender Equity in Virtual Meetings.The Permanente journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is more important than ever to maximize communication in the scientific and medical community. In the context of academic meetings and conferences, there is the growing need for a set of guidelines secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the growing environmental and economic challenges that large academic and medical conferences face. These Virtual Meetings Best Practices were established in response to the scant evidence and guidance on the topic.
methodsThese best practice guidelines were developed from a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature and lay literature. MEDLINE and Embase databases were scoped for relevant, non-duplicate articles. For lay articles, Google searches were utilized. The recommendations that comprise this document are a compilation of nonexperimental descriptive studies (e.g. case studies) and expert committee reports, opinions and/or experience of respected authorities, and lay articles.
resultsWe identified four phases of the meeting cycle: Pre-planning considerations, Planning, Accomplishing conference goals through execution, gauging Response and Engaging the target audience for future cycles (PrePARE). Akin to the Plan, Do, Study, Act Cycle of quality improvement interventions, this document is meant to drive meaningful initial and subsequent interventions in the meetings of the medical and academic community. This covers actions and preparation for registration, scheduling, speakers, attendees, event type, technology, monetization/marketing, dealing with disruptions, post-event deliverables, response and engagement strategies. Enhanced access to integrated, high-quality and efficient virtual meetings will establish a new norm as an effective alternative for innovative health research, education and information dissemination in orthopaedics and beyond.
conclusionsGiven the uncertainty of whether large in-person gatherings will be permitted, advisable or responsible later into the summer of 2020 and beyond, these guidelines will aid events being converted and scheduled as virtual-only meetings. As we move forward in the era of increased utility and utilization of virtual conferencing, these guidelines will serve as a benchmark and standard for surgeons in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.