ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2020
The Essentials of Molecular Testing in CNS Tumors: What to Order and How to Integrate Results.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Adult Patients With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Gliomas in Australia: An Expert Position Statement From the Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Rapid diagnosis of adult-type diffuse glioma using a layered scheme.BMC medicine · 2025Observational
- Events in CNS Tumor Pathology Post-2016 WHO CNS: cIMPACT-NOW Updates and Other Advancements: A Comprehensive Review Plus a Summary of the Salient Features of 2021 WHO CNS 5.International journal of general medicine · 2023Review
- Pediatric High Grade Glioma Classification Criteria and Molecular Features of a Case Series.Genes · 2022Article
- Diagnostic, grading and prognostic role of a restricted miRNAs signature in primary and metastatic brain tumours. Discussion on their therapeutic perspectives.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022Article
- Molecular alterations of low-grade gliomas in young patients: Strategies and platforms for routine evaluation.Neuro-oncology practice · 2021Review
- Beyond IDH-Mutation: Emerging Molecular Diagnostic and Prognostic Features in Adult Diffuse Gliomas.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMolecular testing has become essential for the optimal workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. There is a vast array of testing from which to choose, and it can sometimes be challenging to appropriately incorporate findings into an integrated report. This article reviews various molecular tests and provides a concise overview of the most important molecular findings in the most commonly encountered CNS tumors. RECENT
findingsMany molecular alterations in CNS tumors have been identified over recent years, some of which are incorporated into the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy-Not Official WHO (cIMPACT-NOW) updates. Array-based methylation profiling has emerged over the past couple of years and will likely replace much of currently used ancillary testing for diagnostic purposes. A combination of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel and copy number array is ideal for diffuse gliomas and embryonal tumors, with a low threshold to employ in other tumor types. With the recent advances in molecular diagnostics, it will be ever more important for the pathologist to recognize the molecular testing available, which tests to perform, and to appropriately integrate results in light of clinical, radiologic, and histologic findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32445025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.