Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444940›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Human vestibular perceptual thresholds for pitch tilt are slightly worse than for roll tilt across a range of frequencies.

Kadambari Suri, Torin K Clark

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intra-individual consistency of vestibular perceptual thresholds.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The role of vestibular cues in postural sway.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of Canal-Otolith Integration on Postural Control.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kadambari SuriBioastronautics Laboratory, Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences Department, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3775 Discovery Dr, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Torin K ClarkBioastronautics Laboratory, Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences Department, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3775 Discovery Dr, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. torin.clark@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-9712
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vestibular perceptual thresholds measure vestibular sensory and perceptual noise by quantifying how small of a passive self-motion an individual is able to reliably perceive. Vestibular thresholds have clinical and operational relevance, as they are elevated in vestibular migraine patients, and even healthy individuals with higher (i.e., worse) thresholds have degraded balance. Vestibular thresholds have been quantified across a range of frequencies (motion durations) for rotations and translations, with differences identified for different motion directions (e.g., up/down thresholds are higher than those for left/right motions). While roll tilt thresholds have been well quantified, pitch tilt thresholds have not. Here we aim to quantify pitch tilt thresholds across a range of frequencies and test whether they are higher than in those for roll tilt. In ten normal subjects, we found pitch tilt thresholds at 0.15, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 Hz averaged 1.66, 1.61, 0.99, 0.51 degrees, respectively. Using a general linear model, we found subjects' pitch tilt thresholds were slightly, but significantly, higher than their roll tilt thresholds across all frequencies tested. These differences were approximately 10% at 0.15, 0.2, and 1 Hz and 3% at 0.5 Hz. Pitch tilt thresholds exhibited a similar frequency response as in roll tilt (decreasing a higher frequencies). They also had substantial inter-individual variability, which correlated across pitch tilt frequencies and between pitch and roll tilt thresholds. We discuss why pitch tilt thresholds might be higher, including the pitched-up orientation of the utricular plane of the otoliths, compared to previous studies, and discuss functional implications.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementPostureProprioceptionSensory ThresholdsVestibule, LabyrinthYoung AdultHuman performanceOtolith organsPerceptionSemicircular canalsSignal detection theory

Identifiers

PMID32444940
OpenAlexW3027537330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.