Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444778›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Differential functions of ERK1 and ERK2 in lung metastasis processes in triple-negative breast cancer.

Maria Gagliardi, Mary Kathryn Pitner, Jihyun Park, Xuemei Xie, Hitomi Saso, Richard A Larson, Rachel M Sammons, Huiqin Chen, Caimiao Wei, Hiroko Masuda and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A cytotoxic effect of human lactoferrin fusion with Fc domain of IgG.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Gagliardi *Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mary Kathryn Pitner *Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jihyun ParkSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Xuemei XieSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hitomi SasoSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Richard A LarsonDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rachel M SammonsDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA.
Huiqin ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Caimiao WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hiroko MasudaSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gaurav ChauhanSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kimie KondoSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Debu TripathySection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Naoto T UenoSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kevin N DalbyDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA.
Bisrat G DebebSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chandra BartholomeuszSection of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. chbartho@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAustin College · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Development of Targeted Therapy for ERK Pathway in Breast CancerR00CA139006 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BARTHOLOMEUSZ, CHANDRA · 2013 to 2015
$725k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R00 CA139006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer characterized by metastasis, drug resistance and high rates of recurrence. With a lack or targeted therapies, TNBC is challenging to treat and carries a poor prognosis. Patients with TNBC tumors expressing high levels of ERK2 have a poorer prognosis than those with low ERK2-expressing tumors. The MAPK pathway is often found to be highly activated in TNBC, however the precise functions of the ERK isoforms (ERK1 and ERK2) in cancer progression have not been well defined. We hypothesized that ERK2, but not ERK1, promotes the cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype and metastasis in TNBC. Stable knockdown clones of the ERK1 and ERK2 isoforms were generated in SUM149 and BT549 TNBC cells using shRNA lentiviral vectors. ERK2 knockdown significantly inhibited anchorage-independent colony formation and mammosphere formation, indicating compromised self-renewal capacity. This effect correlated with a reduction in migration and invasion. SCID-beige mice injected via the tail vein with ERK clones were employed to determine metastatic potential. SUM149 shERK2 cells had a significantly lower lung metastatic burden than control mice or mice injected with SUM149 shERK1 cells. The Affymetrix HGU133plus2 microarray platform was employed to identify gene expression changes in ERK isoform knockdown clones. Comparison of gene expression levels between SUM149 cells with ERK2 or ERK1 knockdown revealed differential and in some cases opposite effects on mRNA expression levels. Those changes associated with ERK2 knockdown predominantly altered regulation of CSCs and metastasis. Our findings indicate that ERK2 promotes metastasis and the CSC phenotype in TNBC.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMiceMice, SCIDMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Neoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisRNA, Small InterferingBiomarkers, TumorMAPK1 protein, humanMAPK3 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3RNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID32444778
PMCPMC7244517
OpenAlexW3027667808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.