Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444637›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Cryo-EM structures from sub-nl volumes using pin-printing and jet vitrification.

Raimond B G Ravelli, Frank J T Nijpels, Rene J M Henderikx, Giulia Weissenberger, Sanne Thewessem, Abril Gijsbers, Bart W A M M Beulen, Carmen López-Iglesias, Peter J Peters

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Foam film vitrification for cryo-EM.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raimond B G RavelliThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. rbg.ravelli@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-5888
Frank J T NijpelsThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rene J M HenderikxThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Giulia WeissenbergerThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sanne ThewessemInstrument Development, Engineering and Evaluation (IDEE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2353-4713
Abril GijsbersThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Bart W A M M BeulenCryoSol-World, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7673-2572
Carmen López-IglesiasThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Peter J PetersThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4i), Division of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. pj.peters@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2964-5684
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reveals drawbacks in current sample preparation protocols, such as sample waste and lack of reproducibility. Here, we present several technical developments that provide efficient sample preparation for cryo-EM studies. Pin printing substantially reduces sample waste by depositing only a sub-nanoliter volume of sample on the carrier surface. Sample evaporation is mitigated by dewpoint control feedback loops. The deposited sample is vitrified by jets of cryogen followed by submersion into a cryogen bath. Because the cryogen jets cool the sample from the center, premounted autogrids can be used and loaded directly into automated cryo-EMs. We integrated these steps into a single device, named VitroJet. The device's performance was validated by resolving four standard proteins (apoferritin, GroEL, worm hemoglobin, beta-galactosidase) to ~3 Å resolution using a 200-kV electron microscope. The VitroJet offers a promising solution for improved automated sample preparation in cryo-EM studies.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalCryoelectron MicroscopyProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSingle Molecule ImagingSpecimen HandlingProteins

Identifiers

PMID32444637
PMCPMC7244535
OpenAlexW3027534552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.