Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Mortality of a large wide-ranging mammal largely caused by anthropogenic activities.

M G Gantchoff, J E Hill, K F Kellner, N L Fowler, T R Petroelje, L Conlee, D E Beyer, J L Belant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age-specific survival rates, causes of death, and allowable take of golden eagles in the western United States.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M G GantchoffGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. mggantch@esf.edu.
J E HillGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
K F KellnerGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
N L FowlerGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
T R PetroeljeGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
L ConleeMissouri Department of Conservation, 65201, Columbia, MO, USA.
D E BeyerWildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Marquette, MI, 49855, USA.
J L BelantGlobal Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With efforts to restore large mammal populations following extirpations, it is vital to quantify how they are impacted by human activities and gain insights into population dynamics in relation to conservation goals. Our objective was to characterize cause-specific mortality of black bears (Ursus americanus) throughout their range. We first quantified cause-specific mortality for 247 black bears in one harvested and two non-harvested populations. We then simulated a small recolonizing population with and without anthropogenic mortality. Lastly, we conducted a meta-analysis of all published black bear mortality studies throughout North America (31 studies of 2630 bears). We found anthropogenic mortality was greater than natural mortality, non-harvest anthropogenic mortality (e.g. poaching, defense of property, etc.) was greater in non-harvested populations, and harvesting was one of the major causes of mortality for bears throughout their range. Our simulation indicated that removing anthropogenic mortality increased population size by an average of 23% in 15 years. We demonstrated that bears are exposed to high levels of anthropogenic mortality, and the potential for human activities to slow population growth in expanding populations. Management and conservation of wide-ranging mammals will depend on holistic strategies that integrate ecological factors with socio-economic issues to achieve successful conservation and coexistence.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesHuman ActivitiesLongevityPopulation DynamicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleNorth AmericaPopulation DensityUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID32444633
PMCPMC7244553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.