Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444434›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Metformin in Pregnancy Study (MiPS): protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis.

Aya Mousa, Tone Løvvik, Ijäs Hilkka, Sven M Carlsen, Laure Morin-Papunen, Kristiina Tertti, Tapani Rönnemaa, Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros Nicolaides, Hassan Shehata and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Early life impacts of maternal obesity: a window of opportunity to improve the health of two generations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia aya.mousa@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Tone LøvvikDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ijäs HilkkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Centre, PEDEGO Research Unit, Oulu, Finland.
Sven M CarlsenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Laure Morin-PapunenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Centre, PEDEGO Research Unit, Oulu, Finland.
Kristiina TerttiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tapani RönnemaaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Argyro SyngelakiFetal Medicine Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Kypros NicolaidesFetal Medicine Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Hassan ShehataDepartment of Maternal Medicine, Epsom Hospital, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Christy BurdenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jane E NormanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Janet RowanAuckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jodie M DoddRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-4874
William HagueRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Eszter VankyDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOKing's College London · GBMonash University · AUOulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Turku · FIWomen's and Children's Hospital · AUEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_G1002463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common disorder of pregnancy and contributes to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Metformin is often used for the prevention and management of GDM; however, its use in pregnancy continues to be debated. The Metformin in Pregnancy Study aims to use individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy and to identify relevant knowledge gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and all Evidence-Based Medicine will be systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) testing the efficacy of metformin compared with placebo, usual care or other interventions in pregnant women. Two independent reviewers will assess eligibility using prespecified criteria and will conduct data extraction and quality appraisal of eligible studies. Authors of included trials will be contacted and asked to contribute IPD. Primary outcomes include maternal glycaemic parameters and GDM, as well as neonatal hypoglycaemia, anthropometry and gestational age at delivery. Other adverse maternal, birth and neonatal outcomes will be assessed as secondary outcomes. IPD from these RCTs will be harmonised and a two-step meta-analytic approach will be used to determine the efficacy and safety of metformin in pregnancy, with a priori adjustment for covariates and subgroups to examine effect moderators of treatment outcomes. Sensitivity analyses will assess heterogeneity, risk of bias and the impact of trials which have not provided IPD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All IPD will be deidentified and studies contributing IPD will have ethical approval from their respective local ethics committees. This study will provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy, and may identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from this treatment modality. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at scientific meetings, providing much needed evidence to inform clinical and public health actions in this area.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHypoglycemiaMetforminBlood GlucoseFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeBlood GlucoseMetformindiabetes in pregnancyobstetricspreventive medicinereproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID32444434
PMCPMC7247411
OpenAlexW3026283442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.