Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32444386›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Samira Souffi, Christian Lorenzi, Léo Varnet, Chloé Huetz, Jean-Marc Edeline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dissociable Roles of the Auditory Midbrain and Cortex in Processing the Statistical Features of Natural Sound Textures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Listening in complex acoustic scenes.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samira SouffiDepartment Cognition and Behavior, CNRS, UMR 9197, Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France.
Christian LorenziLaboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, UMR, CNRS 8248, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, F-75230 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Léo VarnetLaboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, UMR, CNRS 8248, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, F-75230 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Chloé HuetzDepartment Cognition and Behavior, CNRS, UMR 9197, Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France.
Jean-Marc EdelineDepartment Cognition and Behavior, CNRS, UMR 9197, Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France jean-marc.edeline@u-psud.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0848-2337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals maintain accurate sound discrimination in the presence of loud sources of background noise. It is commonly assumed that this ability relies on the robustness of auditory cortex responses. However, only a few attempts have been made to characterize neural discrimination of communication sounds masked by noise at each stage of the auditory system and to quantify the noise effects on the neuronal discrimination in terms of alterations in amplitude modulations. Here, we measured neural discrimination between communication sounds masked by a vocalization-shaped stationary noise from multiunit responses recorded in the cochlear nucleus, inferior colliculus, auditory thalamus, and primary and secondary auditory cortex at several signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in anesthetized male or female guinea pigs. Masking noise decreased sound discrimination of neuronal populations in each auditory structure, but collicular and thalamic populations showed better performance than cortical populations at each SNR. In contrast, in each auditory structure, discrimination by neuronal populations was slightly decreased when tone-vocoded vocalizations were tested. These results shed new light on the specific contributions of subcortical structures to robust sound encoding, and suggest that the distortion of slow amplitude modulation cues conveyed by communication sounds is one of the factors constraining the neuronal discrimination in subcortical and cortical levels.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationNoiseAcoustic StimulationAlgorithmsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleGuinea PigsMalePerceptual MaskingSignal-To-Noise RatioSuperior ColliculiThalamusVocalization, Animalamplitude modulationauditory systemmasking noisenatural soundsneural discriminationpopulation recordings

Identifiers

PMID32444386
PMCPMC7329308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.