ArticleJournal of sport and health science2020
Increased Q-Factor increases frontal-plane knee joint loading in stationary cycling.
Article in Journal of sport and health science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining the individual relationship between the step width and peak knee adduction moment during stepping in medial knee osteoarthritis.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2025Article
- Effects of workload on 3D joint moments in cycling and their implications for injury prevention.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Effects of Small and Normalized Q-Factor Changes and Knee Alignment on Knee Biomechanics during Stationary Cycling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Stationary Cycling with Pedal Force Visual Feedback Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Inter-Limb Deficits in Knee Joint Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Changes in Lower-Extremity Gait Biomechanics Following High-Cadence Cycling.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQ-Factor (QF), or the inter-pedal width, in cycling is similar to step-width in gait. Although increased step-width has been shown to reduce peak knee abduction moment (KAbM), no studies have examined the biomechanical effects of increased QF in cycling at different workrates in healthy participants.
methodsA total of 16 healthy participants (8 males, 8 females, age: 22.4 ± 2.6 years, body mass index: 22.78 ± 1.43 kg/m
resultsIncreased QF increased peak KAbM by 47%, 56%, and 56% from Q1 to Q4 at each respective workrate. Mediolateral PRF increased from Q1 to Q4 at each respective workrate. Frontal-plane knee angle and range of motion decreased with increased QF. No changes were observed for peak vertical PRF, knee extension moment, sagittal plane peak knee joint angles, or range of motion.
conclusionIncreased QF increased peak KAbM, suggesting increased medial compartment loading of the knee. QF modulation may influence frontal-plane joint loading when using stationary cycling for exercise or rehabilitation purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.