Observational studyJournal of sport and health science2020
An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations.
Observational study in Journal of sport and health science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficient Ways to Combat Doping in a Sports Education Context!? A Systematic Review on Doping Prevention Measures Focusing on Young Age Groups.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Pooled it
- [Legal and societal aspects of doping in sport].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- Strategic priorities and barriers to an effective anti-doping programme: views and opinions of European NADO leaders.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- The 'selves' in doping and its psychosocial mechanisms: harmonised multi-country evidence from high-performing athletes in the UK, US, and China.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Recreational Athletes' Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances: Results from the First European Randomized Response Technique Survey.Sports medicine - open · 2023Article
- Doping in Paralympic sport: perceptions, responsibility and anti-doping education experiences from the perspective of Paralympic athletes and parasport coaches.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Context matters: athletes' perception of dopers' values, actions and vulnerabilities.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- The association between subjective anti-doping knowledge and objective knowledge among Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Health promoting sports federations: theoretical foundations and guidelines.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Study of an Anti-Doping Education Program in Spanish Sports Sciences Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2022Article
- Answering the call for values-based anti-doping education-An evidence-informed intervention for elite adolescent athletes in Germany and Austria.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- GRADE IT-A Literacy-Based Assessment Tool forFrontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- One Does Not Fit All: European Study Shows Significant Differences in Value-Priorities in Clean Sport.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- A Mixed-Method Evaluation of a Prison Anti-doping Intervention: The Hercules Prison Program.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Attitudes Toward and Susceptibility to Doping in Spanish Elite and National-Standard Track and Field Athletes: An Examination of the Sport Drug Control Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Examining the Current and Future Scientific Field of Antidoping: "Cheaters Should Never Win".Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
- Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne main purpose of the World Anti-Doping Agency was to harmonize anti-doping efforts, including the provision of anti-doping education. A multifaceted approach to doping prevention can play a key role in preventing intentional and unintentional doping. This article aimed to systematically record and evaluate doping prevention approaches in the form of information and education activities of national anti-doping organizations (NADOs) and assess the extent to which a multifaceted doping prevention approach has been realized.
methodsData on anti-doping information and education activities of 53 NADOs were collected via a survey and an online search of the NADOs' websites. Prevention activities were classified into knowledge focused, affective focused, social skills, life skills, and ethic- and value- based. The implementation of the prevention activities was assessed by 4 independent raters using a modified visual analogue scale.
resultsIn total, 59% of the NADOs (n = 38) returned the survey and 70% (n = 45) had information available online. The data were combined for the visual analogue scale assessment. Overall, 58% of the NADOs (n = 37) reported offering activities including elements of all 5 approaches. Results of the raters' assessments indicated that the knowledge-focused approach was best implemented; the implementation of the other 4 approaches was largely unsatisfactory. The most common barriers to implementing doping prevention programs reported by the NADOs were lack of resources (n = 26) and difficulties in collaborating with sports organizations (n = 8).
conclusionResults show a discrepancy between NADOs' self-report data and the implementation assessment. Even though the NADOs indicated otherwise, most of their education-based approaches did not address aspects of the visual analogue scale (e.g., resisting peer pressure) and only a few programs were ongoing. Possible explanations might be found in the reported barriers (e.g., financial). Concrete guidelines defining multifaceted, values-based education, and best practice examples should be developed to indicate how to include all 5 approaches in prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.