Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443979›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Implementing volunteer-navigation for older persons with advanced chronic illness (Nav-CARE): a knowledge to action study.

Barbara Pesut, Wendy Duggleby, Grace Warner, Emily Kervin, Paxton Bruce, Elisabeth Antifeau, Brenda Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  8. Volunteer navigators to support people with life-limiting illness in the community.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara PesutSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 1147 Research Road Arts 3rd Floor, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada. Barb.pesut@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-7190
Wendy DugglebyFaculty of Nursing University of Alberta, 3-141 ECHA 11405 87th Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G1C9, Canada.
Grace WarnerDalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Emily KervinMount Saint Vincent University, 166 Bedford Highway, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M 2J6, Canada.
Paxton BruceUniversity of British Columbia Okanagan, 1147 Research Road. Arts 3rd Floor, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Elisabeth AntifeauRegional Clinical Nurse Specialist, Palliative End-of-Life Care Services, Interior Health, c/o 2nd floor, 333 Victoria Street, Nelson, BC, V1L 4K3, Canada.
Brenda HooperUniversity of British Columbia Okanagan, 1147 Research Road. Arts 3rd Floor, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute 704887CIHR 148655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNav-CARE is a volunteer-led intervention designed to build upon strategic directions in palliative care: a palliative approach to care, a public health/compassionate community approach to care, and enhancing the capacity of volunteerism. Nav-CARE uses specially trained volunteers to provide lay navigation for older persons and family living at home with advanced chronic illness. The goal of this study was to better understand the implementation factors that influenced the utilization of Nav-CARE in eight diverse Canadian contexts.

methodsThis was a Knowledge to Action study using the planned action cycle for Nav-CARE developed through previous studies. Participants were eight community-based hospice societies located in diverse geographic contexts and with diverse capacities. Implementation data was collected at baseline, midpoint, and endpoint using qualitative individual and group interviews. Field notes of all interactions with study sites were also used as part of the data set. Data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The study received ethical approval from three university behavioural review boards. All participants provided written consent.

resultsAt baseline, stakeholders perceived Nav-CARE to be a good fit with the strategic directions of their organization by providing early palliative support, by facilitating outreach into the community and by changing the public perception of palliative care. The contextual factors that determined the ease with which Nav-CARE was implemented included the volunteer coordinator champion, organizational capacity and connection, the ability to successfully recruit older persons, and the adequacy of volunteer preparation and mentorship.

conclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of community-based champions for the success of volunteer-led initiatives and the critical need for support and mentorship for both volunteers and those who lead them. Further, although the underutilization of hospice has been widely recognized, it is vital to recognize the limitations of their capacity. New initiatives such as Nav-CARE, which are designed to enhance their contributions to palliative care, need to be accompanied by adequate resources. Finally, this study illustrated the need to think carefully about the language and role of hospice societies as palliative care moves toward a public health approach to care.

Indexed as

VolunteersAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleGeriatricsHumansMalePatient NavigationQualitative ResearchTranslational Research, Biomedical(3–10) volunteersCompassionate communityHospiceKnowledge translationNavigationPalliativePalliative approachPublic-health

Identifiers

PMID32443979
PMCPMC7245025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.