Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443867›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Influence of Local Pamidronate Application on Alveolar Dimensional Preservation after Tooth Extraction-An Animal Experimental Study.

Frederic Kauffmann, Christian Höhne, Alexandre Thomas Assaf, Tobias Vollkommer, Jan Semmusch, Aline Reitmeier, Jamal Michel Stein, Max Heiland, Ralf Smeets, Rico Rutkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederic KauffmannDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Center for Dental Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Christian HöhneDepartment of Prosthodontics, Julius-Maximilians-University, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Alexandre Thomas AssafDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias VollkommerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Jan SemmuschDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Aline ReitmeierDepartment of Laboratory Animal Science, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Jamal Michel SteinDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital Aachen (RWTH), 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Max HeilandCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Ralf SmeetsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Rico RutkowskiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

BEGO Implant Systems GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany 1103/103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this randomized, controlled animal exploratory trial was to investigate the influence of local application of aminobisphosphonate pamidronate during the socket preservation procedure. Mandibular premolars were extracted in five Göttingen minipigs. Two animals underwent socket preservation using BEGO OSS (n = 8 sockets) and three animals using BEGO OSS + Pamifos (15 mg) (n = 12 sockets). After jaw impression, cast models (baseline, eight weeks postoperative) were digitized using an inLab X5 scanner (Dentsply Sirona) and the generated STL data were superimposed and analyzed with GOM Inspect 2018 (GOM, Braunschweig). After 16 weeks, the lower jaws were prepared and examined using standard histological methods. In the test group (BEGO OSS + pamidronate), buccooral dimensional loss was significantly lower, both vestibulary (0.80 ± 0.57 mm vs. 1.92 ± 0.63 mm;

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossAnimalsBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RegenerationModels, AnatomicPamidronatePostoperative ComplicationsRandom AllocationSwineSwine, MiniatureTooth ExtractionTooth SocketBone Density Conservation AgentsPamidronatebisphosphonatesbone regenerationbone remodelingpamidronateridge preservationsocket preservation

Identifiers

PMID32443867
PMCPMC7279330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.