Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443788›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Environmental Impact on Differential Composition of Gut Microbiota in Indoor Chickens in Commercial Production and Outdoor, Backyard Chickens.

Zuzana Seidlerova, Tereza Kubasova, Marcela Faldynova, Magdalena Crhanova, Daniela Karasova, Vladimir Babak, Ivan Rychlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of a defined bacterial community including and excludingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Gut microbiota and meat quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zuzana SeidlerovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tereza KubasovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela FaldynovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Magdalena CrhanovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Daniela KarasovaVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.
Vladimir BabakVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-1075
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007404Ministerstvo Zemědělství RVO0518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared the caecal microbiota composition of egg-laying hens from commercial production that are kept indoors throughout their whole life with microbiota of hens kept outdoors. The microbiota of outdoor hens consisted of lower numbers of bacterial species than the microbiota of indoor hens. At the phylum level, microbiota of outdoor hens was enriched for Bacteroidetes (62.41 ± 4.47% of total microbiota in outdoor hens and 52.01 ± 6.27% in indoor hens) and Proteobacteria (9.33 ± 4.99% in outdoor and 5.47 ± 2.24% in indoor hens). On the other hand, Firmicutes were more abundant in the microbiota of indoor hens (33.28 ± 5.11% in indoor and 20.66 ± 4.41% in outdoor hens). Horizontally transferrable antibiotic resistance genes

Indexed as

backyard chickencaecumchicken microbiotaenvironmentmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32443788
PMCPMC7285315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.